Dave Portnoy’s refusal to give into cancel culture and apologize for political incorrectness cements his identity as a cancel culture rebel.
J.K. Rowling’s decision to double-down on her resistance to transgender dogma is not surprising but it is powerful, and for one particular reason: her feminist framing.
J.K. Rowling has held the line on refuting transgender rhetoric, and for gender-critical women and real feminists, this is a glorious moment.
First transgenderism destroyed the meaning of womanhood. Now, gender-fluidity and non-binary have destroyed the meaning of transgender.
The same people who spent days generating a Harry Potter reference for their protest signs have called for J.K. Rowling’s literary exile, labeling the author a ‘cruel,’ ‘transphobic’ ‘bigot.’
The 1960s liberals gave birth to this monster who now smites them. But extremism of any kind eventually overreaches and cocoons itself from greater society.
J.K. Rowling made headlines for tweeting in support of an academic who lost her job at a think tank over tweets affirming the reality of biological sex.
J.K. Rowling stands accused not of saying anything wrong, but of simply following people who don’t believe every leftist thing on social media.
If J.K. Rowling is sincerely convinced that the situation merits an expression of regret, why not direct it at the man whom she wronged?
J.K. Rowling provides more proof that, in the Age of Trump, the Left is losing its grip with reality.
Beginning 20 years ago, ‘Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone’ took readers, and later moviegoers, to a magical world full of incredible detail, rich imagery, and even wizard food!
Although few millennials would admit it, their love for ‘Harry Potter’ is more like veneration than fandom: It’s a secular stand-in for religious belief.
While people like J.K. Rowling who react to name-calling mean well, their case for civility is undermined by their own political philosophy and ethical propositions.
Unite with me in opposing one of the greatest threats to the future of our republic: the massive overuse of Harry Potter references in political discussion.
J.K. Rowling may have an army of grown-up children to pile on her Twitter enemies, but she’s still a bad writer. Her adult fans like it because they don’t want to think too hard.
In this movie, J.K. Rowling once again shows her disdain for a media in cahoots with the elite.
‘Harry Potter’ fans who were disappointed by ‘Harry Potter and the Cursed Child’ will find a welcome return of J.K. Rowling’s brilliance in this new film.
If you’re expecting ‘Harry Potter and the Cursed Child’ to be your Portkey back to the world of the original story, you’re in for a disappointment. ‘Cursed Child’ doesn’t belong with the other Potter books.
The Harry Potter franchise has so far featured strong, loving mothers, but not as many iconic fathers. That looks likely to change with ‘Harry Potter and the Cursed Child.’
- Why Do So Many White Women Hate Themselves?Amid societal unrest, woke white women are proving to bcontinue reading >
- Black Lives Matter In Public Schools Is Turning Kids Into Little MarxistsSchool systems across the country are adopting BLM currcontinue reading >
- America Needs To Stop Reacting To Coronavirus Like A Bunch Of HystericsAmericans are learning how to cope with the virus in a continue reading >