The City of Atlanta will pay its former fire chief Kelvin Cochran $1.2 million for firing him after he wrote a Bible study that expressed the Christian view of marriage as between a man and woman.
Contrary to a common media and cultural narrative, majorities of Americans of all ages, income levels, and racial backgrounds strongly oppose political correctnesss.
The ACLU has chosen activism over free speech advocacy for abortion, and hit the warpath against the First Amendment rights of small business owners.
It would have taken a lot of courage for David Remnick to stick to his guns and honor Bannon’s invitation. Instead, he chose the easy way out.
The left is now arguing we may have a right to buy guns and a right to free speech, but we have no right to talk about how to make guns.
As those on the radical Left screech their primal screams at those they perceive to be power-holders, to them it’s a jailbreak. And the First Amendment is the jail keeper.
British actor Rowan Atkinson defended a British politician’s joke about burqas on the grounds that it was funny, and insisted he should not apologize.
To have more success, free speech advocates should stop seeing this issue through a strictly political lens and start considering censorship as a moral problem.
If it’s illegal for the Russians to try to persuade American voters to vote against Hillary Clinton, should it be illegal for the British to do the same against Donald Trump?
Facebook has it wrong. The best way to eliminate bad speech is to fight it with better speech, not pretend it doesn’t exist.
Those who believe the state is better than the market at allocating resources will have the same attitude toward the marketplace of ideas.
In an opinion article posing as a news story, The New York Times launches an illiberal and wrongheaded attack on free speech. At least we know where they stand.
The Canadian attorney general issued a nationwide warrant to catch a man who distributed 3,000 provocative fliers at an event where others proudly wore silhouettes of Christ on their crotches.
The Washington Supreme Court will retake Arlene’s Flowers and likely have to decide whether ‘bouquet’ is in the eye of the beholder, and which beholder’s eye matters more under the law.
This is an identical scenario to what the Left insists is a civil rights violation, dehumanization, an act of bigotry: for a small business owner to decline to serve someone based on differences of belief.
If we no longer believe ‘that all men are created equal [and] endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,’ LGBT activists will have unleashed far worse than a 15-minute delay in access to culinary confections.
The usual political labels of Left and Right cannot explain the exploding attacks on freedom of speech and conscience that are running rampant today.
The Supreme Court’s religious freedom ruling is so narrow it allows bureaucrats to violate your conscience as long as they’re more polite when they do it.
- 30 Years Later, The Traveling Wilburys Debut Record Holds Up As ExtraordinaryThe Wilburys were the ultimate rock supergroup: Petty, continue reading >
- Why Brett Kavanaugh Should Sue Christine Blasey Ford For DefamationThe Senate hearing involving Christine Blasey Ford’s continue reading >
- The Five Most Important Guns In American HistoryThe most consequential guns in U.S. history. Adapted frcontinue reading >