After Bolton trashed Bush in an op-ed, the former president complained that he had expended political capital on Bolton and got little in return.
Instead of playing politics, Washington must realize that risking the lives of American forces in a gamble to reduce Iranian influence in Iraq isn’t worth it and may be self-defeating.
With Russia’s more than 6,000 nuclear warheads, a permanent veto at the U.N. Security Council, and a president keen on making Russia a great power, Washington shouldn’t sideline Moscow.
Sara Leah Whitson publicly campaigns on behalf of settlements in Nagorno-Karabakh, but against settlements Israelis put up.
The president should stop one day talking like a devoted noninterventionist, and the next day putting a great big smile on the faces of neoconservatives.
Past behavior from the major European powers has shown that, unlike Washington, they are far more eager to appease Iran, and far more persistent.
For the first time in a long time, the United States and China are striking a deal to set up better trade relations for both countries.
Just as the Democrats ignored Iranian protesters in 2010 to allow the Iran Deal to come into existence, they’re likely ignoring them once again in order to resurrect it.
Despite Rhodes’ propaganda, America is in a far stronger position to deal with Iran’s provocations under Trump than at any time since Obama entered office.
Iran’s muted response to the killing of Qasem Soleimani has de-escalated the situation in the Middle East. So why are Democrats cowering in fear of the Iranian regime?
Commending those who killed a terrorist responsible for the loss of hundreds of American lives should not be a controversial endeavor, but apparently it is.
U.S. Pentagon officials have confirmed Iran shot down a Ukrainian passenger airliner killing 176 people.
President Trump said that killing Soleimani was an effort to end, not start a war. He was roundly mocked, but that is exactly what he did.
The length, scope, and operational duration of the attack suggests it is a targeted towards regime stability and an internal audience. Whether it leads to further escalation is a political call.
The recent uptick in Iranian attacks on America is very much a part of assessing if Soleimani represented an imminent threat.
The Trump administration is disinterested in providing a forum for this propaganda circus, like CNN did, and that does not indicate a lack of diplomatic grace.
Only the absence of retaliation or some lower-level action that gives both sides a face-saving way out of the predicament can restore deterrence. Otherwise, fight’s on.
Just as we have other options aside from war, it’s worth considering how limited Iran’s appetite for war with the United States actually is.
D.C.’s hysteria is dangerous. The strike wasn’t necessarily wrong, but the president must tread carefully. Too much of D.C. wants him not to.
- How A Hardworking Iowa Dad Exposed A Major Democrat Handicap In 2020In about 30 seconds, one man in Iowa exposed a major wecontinue reading >
- Trump Is Right. Adam Schiff Has Not Paid For Damaging The Country With Years Of LiesSchiff was not telling the truth when he kept dripping continue reading >
- The Best Outfits Of The 2020 Grammy AwardsWhat the Grammys showed us, oddly, is a culture in criscontinue reading >