I’ve been blessed to have men in my life who have always treated me with dignity and kindness — I can’t say American feminism has done the same.
How can we expect to improve women’s health care when we are focused on re-labeling woman-specific anatomy as to not offend those who have no female anatomy?
The feminists’ march to androgyny appears to give women more options. In reality, they cut women off from the very things that lead to flourishing and happiness.
Women are being silenced and threatened by a false ideology wearing feminist clothes forcing feminists to destroy opportunities for girls and women.
Both ERA and the Equality Act are solely about ‘sex’ and its ever-changing definition. When sex is redefined, all women lose.
Leftist writers don’t want women who understand basic biological truths to speak; they don’t want them to get together and talk; and they definitely don’t want them on social media.
The left’s feminist narrative has become divided and incoherent as transgender ideology has advanced. Conservatives can present an affirming alternative.
In her recent Vogue essay, model Emily Ratajkowski signals her most progressive beliefs, only to find herself wrestling with the pesky reality that is biology.
‘Mike Pence is a former television commentator and does have a very calm demeanor, but I think a lot of people were noticing some mansplaining going on tonight,’ mansplained George Stephanopoulos.
Her very existence repudiates the left’s binary thinking about womanhood, that women have to deny what makes women different from men to achieve professionally. And that’s why they hate her.
These instances are proof that if a woman or girl’s suffering does not fit into the left’s narrative, it is ignored. They are a small sample of the way the left treats women.
J.K. Rowling’s decision to double-down on her resistance to transgender dogma is not surprising but it is powerful, and for one particular reason: her feminist framing.
Conservatives calling out hypocrisy aren’t rewriting history. We’re ignoring the New York Times’ semantic diversion to hold Democrats accountable to the standard they created. Will they #BelieveWomen or not?
Those who objected to the ‘believe women’ injunction did so not because they hated women or failed to hate rape, but because they discerned its shortsightedness and potential for abuse.
Feminism on the whole has never been about true equality. As Tara Reade has discovered, its privileges extend only to those who respect the feminist identity-politics alliance.
Before the Me Too movement, women who cried assault were often ignored. In this new era, women are to be believed based not on evidence, but on their ability to be used for politics.
While Alyssa Milano is hesitant to believe Joe Biden’s accuser without a ‘thorough investigation,’ she believed Christine Blasey Ford’s allegation against Brett Kavanaugh the same day it went public.
The sweeping language of the Equal Rights Amendment provides a practically endless number of potential legal hooks for gender-bending social engineering from the bench.
Conventional wisdom has it that women become invisible once they pass 40, but three newsy women — Shakira, J. Lo, and Nancy Pelosi — this week proved that isn’t always true.
Jill Filipovic says the words ‘pursuit of happiness’ in the Declaration of Independence mean that ‘government must facilitate the ability of the individual to seek happiness,’ which to her means redistributing people’s labor.
- What My Dad Taught Me, His Daughter, About Manhood — And Why It MattersWe have a cultural imperative to teach boys how to be mcontinue reading >
- Mickey Guyton Represents The Left’s Next Cultural Conquest: Country MusicMickey Guyton is every self-conscious, self-loathing Nacontinue reading >
- In An Affront To Its Namesake, The Tolkien Society Goes WokeThat men and women now come to slander and distort thescontinue reading >