Creating a sex-neutral society would erase the benefits women receive while majorly expanding government power. All to appease the faux-feminist left.
This week Christina Hoff Sommers and Roxane Gay took the stage for two much-anticipated debates in Australia about free speech, feminism, and due process.
Should ERA win passage, the result would be a dramatically empowered federal government on issues it decides impact women. That’s a threat to women, not a protection.
In discussing ‘how to contribute to the advancement of women around the world in ways that honor their integral human development,’ a recent United Nations panel focused on women’s traditional roles.
The #Resistance feared attacks on women’s health and acted accordingly. They’re well within their rights to do so, but the hysteria is a bit much.
In opposing judicial nominee Neomi Rao, Sen. Kamala Harris perpetrates the idea that women are helpless victims who need to be protected for their own good.
Not only is the bill based on a false premise—there isn’t a wage gap, there’s a choice gap—women are usually making choices about their job so they can also raise a family.
A feminist culture that disparages full-time motherhood necessarily places intense pressure on women to maintain their level of professional success after becoming mothers.
Mallory clammed up when pressed further on the issue, saying “I’m done talking about this. You can move on.”
She doesn’t deserve to be lauded as millennials’ feminist icon. Her incompetence with numbers and jumbled facts validate every negative stereotype women have been trying to erase for years.
If you thought Hillary Clinton’s #ImWithHer was bad, get ready for an overdose of estrogen in what could be the most wide open Democratic presidential primary since 1992.
Gillette isn’t against the patriarchy, they’re against the bad patriarchy. What we need, more than ever, is men willing to fight for good patriarchy.
The left’s assault on women-only spaces erases femininity in pursuit of a perfect gender parity that doesn’t exist (and never will).
Pressed to condemn Louis Farrakhan’s anti-Semitic remarks during a Monday appearance on ‘The View,’ Women’s March co-president Tamika Mallory refused.
Peter Beinart fails to establish his theory of misogyny as the definitive attribute of an authoritarian front from Manila to Milan, partly because many of his examples are dishonest or obtuse.
Blaming everything, including our own challenges, and our own grave errors in judgement, on the tyrannical patriarchy will not yield a better world for women.
The Women’s March has an anti-Semitism problem, and it’s causing the left-wing movement to come apart at the seams.
- What We Know So Far About The Justice Department’s Spygate Scandal InvestigationsWhen Barr testified before the Senate Judiciary Committcontinue reading >
- ‘Wine Country’ Is Just Terrible, And The Inside Jokes Might Be Why'Wine Country' is outright cringe-inducing from start tcontinue reading >
- Reporters Should Press Presidential Candidate Bill De Blasio On ‘Toxic Whiteness’New York City is being sued for discriminating against continue reading >