Skip to content
Breaking News Alert Grassley Launches Probe Into 'Monumental Security Failure' By Secret Service

More Than 50 Prominent British Writers Rally To Defend J.K. Rowling Against Online Vitriol

Fellow British writers stood with J.K. Rowling against a recent wave of ‘insidious, authoritarian and misogynistic’ hate speech on social media.


A group of prominent British authors, writers, actors, and artists signed an open letter defending author J.K. Rowling against another recent surge in online attacks for her feminist, pro-woman views that defy the dogma of the transgender mob.

Published in this weekend’s The Sunday Times, the letter calls the “hate speech” lodged at the “Harry Potter” author an “insidious, authoritarian and misogynistic trend in social media.” Signatories include authors Ian McEwan, Lionel Shriver, and Susan Hill, actors Griff Rhys Jones and Frances Barber, and TV writer Graham Linehan.

“Rowling has consistently shown herself to be an honourable and compassionate person, and the appalling hashtag #RIPJKRowling is just the latest example of hate speech directed against her and other women that Twitter and other platforms enable and implicitly endorse,” the letter reads.

For more than a year now, Rowling has critiqued transgender ideology, explaining how denying biological reality hurts women. She doubled down on her beliefs in the face of intense backlash this summer, self-publishing a long essay on why she is speaking out on sex and gender. “Harry Potter” fans and transgender activists called the essay “devastating.”

On Wednesday, actor John Cleese, of “Monty Python” and “Fawlty Towers” fame, tweeted that he would also add his name to the list of those in solidarity with Rowling.

Cleese has previously stood up to the “woke” crowd as a defender of comedy and free speech, as well as a critique of sex and race as a “social construct.” In June, Cleese spoke out against the removal of a “Fawlty Towers” episode now deemed “problematic.” Last summer, Cleese posted a series of tweets taking aim at political correctness and the evidence-free claim of a sexual “spectrum.”