On this episode of the Federalist Radio Hour, David Harsanyi interviews Mollie Hemingway and Carrie Severino on their new book, “Justice On Trial.”
Contrasting the list of potential nominees Trump released during 2016, a new ad calls out Democratic candidates’ lack of specifics on the Supreme Court.
“Enshrining a constitutional right to an abortion based solely on the race, sex, or disability of an unborn child, as Planned Parenthood advocates, would constitutionalize the views of the 20th-century eugenics movement.”
Biden carries plenty of political baggage with him after almost a half-century in Washington politics, but Anita Hill might be the biggest problem of all.
Apparently, even a favorable hearing in front of the whole world is not enough for a woman alleging that a man has sexually wronged her. Now we have to rewrite history to affirm allegations that the evidence contradicts.
It’s true that Joe Biden did his best to help Anita Hill, including concealing witnesses who would have been a disaster under examination. But even he admitted to his colleague that Hill was lying.
To say the U.S. can do better is one thing. To say American culture is a unique purveyor of racism and misogyny, as Biden does, is historical illiteracy.
So long as universal injunctions exist, plaintiffs will be able to impose their policy preferences on the entire country, if they find a willing judge.
Anita Hill’s accusations against Clarence Thomas during his Supreme Court confirmation in many ways parallel those against Brett Kavanaugh.
The transparent bad faith exhibited by Democrats regarding Brett Kavanugh ensures future allegations will be met with skepticism.
During a Supreme Court confirmation fight in the Senate, Joe Biden once described FBI investigations into sexual harassment as worthless.
Emily Jashinsky joins Federalist Radio to discuss figures like Norm MacDonald, Louis C.K., Brett Kavanaugh, and how the culture is trying to sort them all.
Senior Contributor Benjamin Weingarten interviews professor and classical liberal Richard Epstein on Clarence Thomas, progressivism, and socialism.
They underscore the right not to be compelled to worship at the government’s altar, speak the government’s message, or join the government’s associations.
‘Nationwide injunctions mean that each of the more than 600 federal district judges in the United States can freeze a law or regulation throughout the country — regardless of whether the other 599 disagree.’
The Supreme Court has taken a constitutional provision intended to limit government power and turned it into a mandate for unlimited government power.
The Supreme Court’s religious freedom ruling is so narrow it allows bureaucrats to violate your conscience as long as they’re more polite when they do it.
On the cases with less political valence the justices can ‘nerd out’ on legal theories and reveal their jurisprudential minds when they know their decisions won’t make the front pages.
The sexual harassment allegations against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas have been repeatedly undermined by their own creators. Reviving them is embarrassing.
The Supreme Court was specifically designed to avoid almost every idea term-limit advocates think bolsters their arguments.
- Here’s Your Guide To The Latest Wild Developments With Michael FlynnIn the escalating dispute between government attorneys continue reading >
- New York Times Fudged Book Sales Data To Torpedo ‘Justice on Trial’ Best-Seller RankingThe New York Times blatantly ignored sales data to torpcontinue reading >
- Why CNN’s Normalizing Of A White Nationalist MattersNo one does more to normalize white supremacists than ocontinue reading >