Ever since he matured from Marxist revolutionary to conservative heavyweight champ, the American left has felt free to smear Clarence Thomas. That’s because he’s so awesome.
District Court Judge Eric Moye sentenced a Dallas salon owner to seven days in jail and ordered her to pay a $7,000 fine for violating lockdown orders.
With three conservatives and three liberals signing on to the originalist ruling in Ramos v. Louisiana, we see more evidence that the ‘living Constitution’ school of thought is in decline.
It’s time to restore real black history: recognition of achievement and overcoming obstacles as citizens integral to this great nation.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas faced down a ‘high-tech lynching’ by the same people who now claim to be America’s arbiters of racial justice. He has every reason to be vindictive and chooses not to be.
‘It’s a classic story of going from dire poverty in the segregated South to the highest court of the land, including many spiritual and intellectual twists and turns.’
Justice Neil Gorsuch issued a concurring opinion about the threat nationwide injunctions present to separation of powers and the role of the courts under the Constitution.
Ginsburg, 86, has experienced a series of health difficulties in recent years, prompting anxiety on the left over the late Supreme Court justice’s health and capacity to do her job.
The first electoral cycle is that of presidential impeachments; the second is that of Supreme Court nominations. Soon the two cycles may intersect.
Democrats, who have no interest in living with the constraints of the Constitution, see little downside in destroying trust in the Supreme Court.
‘I never observed in him the qualities of intellect, vision, exceptional integrity, or savvy that are required to be an effective president,’ Brown said. ‘I will be surprised if he survives the primaries.’
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas doesn’t want to set fire to the rule of law. He simply wants to let the Constitution, the real Constitution, once again be what it claims to be — the supreme law of the land.
On this episode of the Federalist Radio Hour, David Harsanyi interviews Mollie Hemingway and Carrie Severino on their new book, “Justice On Trial.”
Contrasting the list of potential nominees Trump released during 2016, a new ad calls out Democratic candidates’ lack of specifics on the Supreme Court.
“Enshrining a constitutional right to an abortion based solely on the race, sex, or disability of an unborn child, as Planned Parenthood advocates, would constitutionalize the views of the 20th-century eugenics movement.”
Biden carries plenty of political baggage with him after almost a half-century in Washington politics, but Anita Hill might be the biggest problem of all.
Apparently, even a favorable hearing in front of the whole world is not enough for a woman alleging that a man has sexually wronged her. Now we have to rewrite history to affirm allegations that the evidence contradicts.
It’s true that Joe Biden did his best to help Anita Hill, including concealing witnesses who would have been a disaster under examination. But even he admitted to his colleague that Hill was lying.
To say the U.S. can do better is one thing. To say American culture is a unique purveyor of racism and misogyny, as Biden does, is historical illiteracy.
So long as universal injunctions exist, plaintiffs will be able to impose their policy preferences on the entire country, if they find a willing judge.
- Mandatory Masks Aren’t About Safety, They’re About Social ControlTo those looking to benefit politically from emergenciecontinue reading >
- It’s Time To Stop Pretending Twitter Is NeutralIf Twitter wants to editorialize and 'factcheck' Presidcontinue reading >
- Media’s Unpunished Lies Hurt The Nation Far Worse Than Trump’s Indefensible TweetsThe grim joke of the 20th century was that one death iscontinue reading >