The campaign’s appeal to the Supreme Court marks Trump’s latest challenge in the November contest, with dozens of lawsuits filed and thrown out in several other tipping-point states.
The Supreme Court sided with a rural Colorado church Tuesday that had challenged the state Democratic governor’s COVID rules restricting capacity.
After Texas v. Pennsylvania, conservatives must rediscover their opposition to judicial overreach. A Warren Court of the right is not the solution we need.
Those disappointed in the outcome of this election and of the Texas suit should not lose sight of the constitutional values that will last far beyond any one lawsuit and any one election.
It is hard to believe the justices put the constitutional question above their desire to avoid appearing to meddle in the 2020 election.
‘Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections,’ the Supreme Court ruled.
Texas argues that the case ‘presents constitutional questions of immense national consequences,’ namely that the 2020 election suffered from serious constitutional irregularities.
Raphael Warnock owes Georgians an answer to the question of court packing, just as Joe Biden still owes one to all of America.
‘Even if the Constitution has taken a holiday during this pandemic, it cannot become a sabbatical,’ wrote Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.
A second challenge to Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s discriminatory COVID rules that targeted Orthodox Jews provides a crucial test for the new Supreme Court.
Pennsylvania is counting votes in violation of the Constitution and it needs to stop.
As a conservative, an originalist, and a black American, I am greatly intrigued by Sen. Edward Markey’s claim that applying the Constitution as it’s written is racist.
Democrats don’t have to publicly commit to a party goal of packing the Supreme Court. They’ve got a rich network of activist groups working hard on the issue behind closed doors.
Had Democrats given Trump’s judicial nominees due respect and consideration, they could have had more influence over Barrett’s nomination process.
Democrats are promising vengeance for Republicans using their electoral victories to fulfill promises to voters about courts. We shouldn’t ignore their threats.
The Republican-led Senate voted to confirm Amy Coney Barrett after a contentious confirmation battle, shifting the court back to constitutional jurisprudence.
After a week of committee hearings, Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation will go to the full Senate for a vote. Democrat members of the committee boycotted the vote.
Democratic Nominee Joe Biden said if elected, he will study “how to reform the court system” because it is “getting out of whack.”
It took a few decades of the left playing the exact same games with most confirmation battles, but finally the right figured out how to render those attacks worthless.
- The Nuclear Energy Advancements Of The Past Four Years Will Blow Your MindFission energy can change America's power for the bettecontinue reading >
- Chuck Schumer Endorses Biden’s Plan To Force Public Schools To Allow Males In Female BathroomsBiden has promised to grant transgender students' privicontinue reading >
- Grandma-Killer Gov. Andrew Cuomo Deflects From His Failures By Attacking Janice Dean’s Career"She's not a credible source on anything except maybe tcontinue reading >