Americans fighting for LGBTQ causes shouldn’t be so quick to cheer the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock. It’s better to win by persuasion than by force.
The faulty legal foundation of Roe must be confronted, one case at a time, one judicial appointment at a time — which is why elections are so crucial.
Roberts’ infidelity to the Constitution took him straight to bed with a seductive abortion lobby that whispered sweet nothings into his ear about what women want. He listened, and now vulnerable women will pay the price.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that states cannot exclude religious schools from state scholarship programs in a 5-4 decision.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts is a politician — a politician who consistently makes laws, inconsistently applies the Constitution, and can’t be voted out of office.
“If the Chief Justice believes his political judgment is so exquisite, I invite him to resign, travel to Iowa, and get elected,” Cotton said.
The Supreme Court effectively just told Americans that they must consider men women and women men in the workplace. This will not end well.
The Supreme Court’s ruling obliterates any commonsense distinctions between the sexes and makes a defining of sex clearly subjective and superfluous.
It’s laughable to argue that anyone who wrote — or read — the Civil Rights Act of 1964 understood ‘sex’ to mean anything other than male or female.
The fact that four justices who complained that the court needed to hear Second Amendment cases passed on 10 chances to do so tells us much about the court’s ‘swing vote.’
The recent SCOTUS decision seems like an LGBT victory, but not so fast. By linking the rights of gay and transgender people to sex, the left has bound itself to whatever definition ‘sex’ takes on.
The ruling will lead to a tsunami of polarizing court cases and further degradation of Americans’ natural rights to free speech, to free association, and to worshipping God as their consciences require.
Justice Alito dissented, noting the definition of sex is not one that can be modified through the Court’s interpretation,
As America’s cities burn and leftist sympathizers make headlines, the U.S. Supreme Court quietly passed a potentially horrendous ruling against religious freedom.
Ever since he matured from Marxist revolutionary to conservative heavyweight champ, the American left has felt free to smear Clarence Thomas. That’s because he’s so awesome.
With three conservatives and three liberals signing on to the originalist ruling in Ramos v. Louisiana, we see more evidence that the ‘living Constitution’ school of thought is in decline.
A court case over whether Philadelphia can ban Christian organizations from working with foster children offers the Supreme Court an opportunity to restore plurality to American life.
Some activists in the media and elsewhere tried to downplay the Senate minority leader’s remarks by saying they echoed Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s words when he expressed concern for the country.
No matter how the Supreme Court votes on Obamacare, people will be angry. But it must stand by the Constitution, and that means canceling the Affordable Care Act.
- CDC: After 10-Week Decline In COVID-19 Deaths, It May Soon No Longer Be An EpidemicWhile policymakers toy with the idea of a second shutdocontinue reading >
- NYC Councilwoman Freaks Out Over White Man Holding Black Child: ‘It Hurts People’'This is how black and indigenous people of color see tcontinue reading >
- Democrat Senator: Founding Fathers And American Heroes Are ‘Dead Traitors’Among those mentioned were the founding fathers, the prcontinue reading >