Why the former California Supreme Court justice and D.C. circuit judge would be a natural choice in the Trump administration.
Despite years of case law emptying free exercise, the Supreme Court has now confirmed that government cannot apply laws in a discriminatory way against religious believers.
If one’s exposure to the case was limited to the popular media, you might think this case was only about the free-speech rights of wedding-cake makers. It’s much more.
Execution of criminals who have committed the most heinous of crimes must be done as painlessly as possible. Why not unborn children?
- Why John Roberts’ Citizenship Decision Is Legally And Politically CorruptSince when is the Supreme Court in the business of goincontinue reading >
- Why Scarlett Johansson Is Mostly Right About Identity-Blind CastingThe 'Avengers' star is generally right that actors can continue reading >
- Creepy Porn Lawyer Michael Avenatti Endorses Mollie Hemingway’s Kavanaugh Blockbuster: ‘Complete Trash’ By ‘Complete Hacks’Michael Avenatti, who is under federal investigation focontinue reading >