Our cultural elites treat opposition to same-sex marriage as beyond the bounds of reasonable discourse. But three years’ more experience only reinforce that it’s a legal and cultural mistake.
The Washington Supreme Court will retake Arlene’s Flowers and likely have to decide whether ‘bouquet’ is in the eye of the beholder, and which beholder’s eye matters more under the law.
The Masterpiece Cake ruling made clear that noxious ideas of ‘speech equality’ and the need to police ‘hate speech’ are out of step with the Constitution.
The ruling seems like a victory for religious freedom, but a closer look shows three things about the ruling that people who believe letting others live authentically can’t afford to ignore.
Don’t be fooled by the Supreme Court’s 7-2 ruling. A menacing view of the First Amendment lurks in the details of the Masterpiece Cakeshop case.
‘You can put micro doses of LSD in your cereal and people will call you a pioneer. But the one thing you cannot be is a Christian.’
Marquette is attempting to fire a tenured professor for public comment on a matter of great public and institutional concern.
Chick-fil-A is not merely a fast food restaurant run by Christians; it is God, speaking to us through food.
During Thursday’s confirmation hearing, Sen. Corey Booker (D-N.J.) raked secretary of state nominee Mike Pompeo over the coals for his beliefs on same-sex marriage.
I share this, because too often we hear nothing but negative stories from LGBT media of hate and discrimination.
Same-sex marriage is now considered a constitutional right. But the right to bear arms is actually in the constitution.
A North Carolina magistrate thought she lost everything when she was forced to resign from her job due to her religious beliefs. She sued the state over discrimination and a federal judge awarded her $300,000.
The Oregon Court of Appeals upheld a $135,000 fine against the owners of a local cake shop who declined to use their artistic skills to create a custom cake for a same-sex wedding.
The Christian small business owners involved in these lawsuits have no desire to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, nor do they ask for the right to do so.
Except for justices Kagan and Ginzburg, an uneasiness about the case was evident to a greater and lesser degree among the other 7 Supreme Court justices.
If I encountered an individual morally uncomfortable with participating in an activity with me and my boyfriend, it would be uncomfortable for me to force her.
Most justices first frame the issue by using judicial discretion of one kind or another to remove from consideration the nature of the product requested for a same-sex wedding.
If one’s exposure to the case was limited to the popular media, you might think this case was only about the free-speech rights of wedding-cake makers. It’s much more.
- Biden: Hero Who Stopped Texas Church Shooter Was Wrong To Have A GunJoe Biden says the hero who stopped the Texas church shcontinue reading >
- How The IG FISA Abuse Report Affects Michael Flynn’s Case‘Far too many in the FBI and DOJ are willing to hide continue reading >
- Faked-Up Fox News Sexual Harassment ‘Bombshell’ Film Fizzles Like A DudHuge dollops of deceit undercut both the credibility ancontinue reading >