No country should allow the sale of children or the intentional creation of orphans, which, make no mistake, is exactly what is happening with surrogacy.
By forcing the issue through an activist Supreme Court that fabricated a ‘right,’ the LGBT left have made themselves vulnerable to new justices recognizing this as unconstitutional.
The ‘love is love’ strategy was so successful for the gay marriage lobby, why should polygamists reinvent the wheel?
We can especially feel an intense hostility towards the very idea of marriage that Saint Valentine represented: the union of one man and one woman, centered on Christ, and loyal until death.
By refusing to recognize the Log Cabin Republicans, the Texas state GOP further alienates those who may otherwise be receptive to Republican messaging both within the state and beyond.
In 2020, Washington state insists the female perspective is critical to corporations. But in 2018, it insisted the female perspective was optional for children.
As Chick-fil-A expands internationally, a company executive said charitable giving to Christian organizations was inhibiting the chain’s growth.
It seems to me that if Christians are serious about avoiding errors that are ‘incredibly damaging to the gospel and the church,’ we will be careful to get sex and marriage exactly right.
Minnesota can’t coerce Carl and Angel Larsen into betraying their convictions and promoting ideas or telling stories they find objectionable, the Eighth Circuit ruled.
Buttigieg needs to say whether there’s a place for marriage traditionalists in the Democratic Party and stop invoking the ‘right side of history’ trope.
When biology isn’t the basis for parenthood, it’s a major power grab for the state. This Supreme Court case has the potential to either strengthen or degrade every parent-child relationship in the country.
The stereotypes are so crude they border on parody. You would think someone who was thrust into super stardom by country music fans might have more respect for people from different backgrounds.
A New York Times op-ed suggests allowing any religious liberty claims opens the door to spurious claims of religious liberty. This is utterly foolish.
I’m grateful that gay conservatives are fighting the religious bigotry being imposed on people of faith this era of ‘tolerance.’ However, gay marriage presents a more significant threat to another vulnerable group.
Gay marriage changed me. I found purpose and connection unlike anything I ever knew before. Can’t this coexist with religious Americans’ rights?
For the good of our country, we invite Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Cory Booker to reread the Constitution and rediscover the merits of religious diversity and freedom of conscience.
- Leftists Are Colonizing Red Towns Like Mine, And Local Republicans Are CluelessComplacency is a problem for east Tennesseans. They arecontinue reading >
- McConnell’s Impeachment BlunderSenate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell made a terrible continue reading >
- I Saw Provocateurs At The Capitol Riot On Jan. 6The deadly riot at the U.S. Capitol bore the markings ocontinue reading >