A New York Times op-ed suggests allowing any religious liberty claims opens the door to spurious claims of religious liberty. This is utterly foolish.
I’m grateful that gay conservatives are fighting the religious bigotry being imposed on people of faith this era of ‘tolerance.’ However, gay marriage presents a more significant threat to another vulnerable group.
Gay marriage changed me. I found purpose and connection unlike anything I ever knew before. Can’t this coexist with religious Americans’ rights?
For the good of our country, we invite Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Cory Booker to reread the Constitution and rediscover the merits of religious diversity and freedom of conscience.
The Netherlands’ Public Prosecution Service is currently investigating whether the Nashville Statement violates Dutch discrimination laws.
Embryos are routinely manufactured according to specification — their genetic makeup is literally chosen from a catalogue.
The City of Atlanta will pay its former fire chief Kelvin Cochran $1.2 million for firing him after he wrote a Bible study that expressed the Christian view of marriage as between a man and woman.
Trump’s policy change actually supports gay American diplomats, promotes gay rights abroad, and treats same-sex and opposite-sex couples equally.
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh told senators, ‘The days of discriminating against gay and lesbian Americans or treating [them] as inferior in dignity and worth are over.’
Surrogacy does not serve human relationships. Surrogacy severs human relationships, which damages our shared human future.
The debate around adoption rules is dangerously centered on the needs of adults — at the expense of the kids in question.
Our cultural elites treat opposition to same-sex marriage as beyond the bounds of reasonable discourse. But three years’ more experience only reinforce that it’s a legal and cultural mistake.
The Washington Supreme Court will retake Arlene’s Flowers and likely have to decide whether ‘bouquet’ is in the eye of the beholder, and which beholder’s eye matters more under the law.
The Masterpiece Cake ruling made clear that noxious ideas of ‘speech equality’ and the need to police ‘hate speech’ are out of step with the Constitution.
The ruling seems like a victory for religious freedom, but a closer look shows three things about the ruling that people who believe letting others live authentically can’t afford to ignore.
Don’t be fooled by the Supreme Court’s 7-2 ruling. A menacing view of the First Amendment lurks in the details of the Masterpiece Cakeshop case.
- What We Know So Far About The Justice Department’s Spygate Scandal InvestigationsWhen Barr testified before the Senate Judiciary Committcontinue reading >
- We All Need To Admit That America Has A Tattoo ProblemAmerica, we need to talk. You might not want to admit tcontinue reading >
- ‘Wine Country’ Is Just Terrible, And The Inside Jokes Might Be Why'Wine Country' is outright cringe-inducing from start tcontinue reading >