The hypocritical ruling class has a nasty habit of trying to redefine Christian belief and religious practice.
The Supreme Court determined that the exorbitant restrictions on church attendence were in violation of the First Amendment’s protection of Free Expression.
“We do not need the state’s permission to serve and worship our Lord as He has commanded,” elders of Grace Community Church said.
Grace Community Church has been embroiled in litigation since they first defied Gov. Newsom’s orders to cease indoor gatherings in early July.
Pastor Ché Ahn argues the Constitution makes it clear the government cannot prevent citizens from gathering to worship.
Two-thirds of Americans think that “internal religious disputes” and decisions about who to employ in religious teaching positions should be up to religious organizations, not the state.
President Trump fights a more significant battle than just this nomination by appointing him. He fights for the liberties of all Americans, regardless of faith.
The leftist culture-shapers who claim to champion ‘tolerance’ and ‘ending discrimination’ push for toxic identity politics that make true tolerance impossible.
The Supreme Court will rule on the scope of the ‘ministerial exception’ and whether the government has to power to pick religious schools’ teachers.
The Netherlands’ Public Prosecution Service is currently investigating whether the Nashville Statement violates Dutch discrimination laws.
This case was a loss for both sides from the start, because of what it signals about tolerance of opposing views in this country.
The Masterpiece Cakeshop decision is a win. But what stops the state from cloaking its animus against Christianity and crushing religious freedom? Not much.
A refusal to make two homosexuals a cake for a gay wedding, when paired with an offer to serve them in any other way, is not some sly strike at an individual for his identity.
If the forcible removal of baptized children from non-Catholic parents was just in the nineteenth century, it remains, in principle, no less so today.
The concern is not about denying a service to an individual based on gender identity, it is an issue of requiring a medical professional to take an action he deeply and morally opposes.
Cake artist Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cakeshop delivered the following statement during a news conference Tuesday.
Most justices first frame the issue by using judicial discretion of one kind or another to remove from consideration the nature of the product requested for a same-sex wedding.
Telling Christians, like Barronelle Stutzman, to affirm or participate in same-sex marriages effectively tells them to contradict what they believe to be foundational truths about the world.
If the Wyoming Supreme Court is permitted to insert an unstated requirement upon judges, what prevents some future court from reading pastors, priests, and bishops into the same decision?
The 3-2 decision of the Wyoming Supreme Court says holding mainstream Christian beliefs undermines Judge Ruth Neely’s impartiality even though marriages aren’t part of her duties.
- Billie Eilish’s Jarring New Vogue Cover Is A Window Into Gen Z’s Struggle With SexBillie Eilish resonates with her generation because shecontinue reading >
- The Cost Of Virtue Signaling Is Getting High — And Leading Directly To A Social Credit System'Black out your square' on Instagram? That was last yeacontinue reading >
- Joe Biden Dodged Half A Million In Taxes, And He Wants You To Pay Your ‘Fair Share’How can someone who avoided more than $500,000 in taxescontinue reading >