Whacking the “Mr.” from Potato Head was motivated by the same impulses that drove progressives to draft the Equality Act: Both seek to nix sex distinctions.
The University of Delaware offers or advertises a lot of scholarship and grant money exclusively for female students. Men may not apply — unless they are transgender.
This executive order combined with Supreme Court precedent amounts to imposing a national sexual orientation and gender identity law on the entire country.
What Lambda portrays as discrimination based on gender identity is not sex discrimination under the reasoning of Bostock.
The ruling will lead to a tsunami of polarizing court cases and further degradation of Americans’ natural rights to free speech, to free association, and to worshipping God as their consciences require.
Neither an anti-discrimination law nor its new regulations will fix the mess that is the current college dating scene and the source of so much Title IX activity.
The U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights ‘will investigate whether the University expresses an unlawful preference for women in its employment and hiring practices.’
Edith Stein’s story appears ripe for appropriation as a cudgel with which to beat traditional ideas regarding God, politics, and sex. But she chose an approach other than resentment and anger.
What the Sixth Circuit did by unilaterally imposing a trendy notion that sex and biology aren’t related was an attempt to silence one point of view. The Supreme Court can correct that.
In the final analysis, no moral difference exists between a female coach saying she would never hire a male assistant, and a white man saying that he would never hire a black.
The film’s worshipful portrayal of Ginsburg as a pioneering champion of equal rights for women provides no indication of an intellectual inconsistency that would have shown her as fallibly human.
In a first for the Trump U.S Department of Education, this rollback will also undo Clinton and Bush-era policies, to adhere more closely to the law and Supreme Court precedent, an administration official told The Federalist.
The decision rests on a firm and universal understanding of both ‘woman’ and ‘man,’ the kind of black and white labels the LGBT community typically avoids.
A company that allocates salary blind to an employee’s sex has still generated a pay gap, because men and women make different choices.
Google fired James Damore for ‘advancing harmful gender stereotypes.’ He claims the company engages in illegal race and sex quotas and discriminates against non-progressives and men.
The judges telegraphed pretty clearly their view that the government could force Harris Funeral Homes to allow Anthony Stevens to present as a woman at work.
James Damore can present a prima facie case of illegal retaliation from Google: he engaged in protected activity by opposing several discriminatory practices, and was fired from his job.
Transgender activists are not pushing for equality but entitlement. While their distress matters, other people’s distress due to their demands does not.
The assumption in Obergefell that the sexes are interchangeable is affecting laws and regulations that concern sex differences in many other forms.
Let’s stop pretending trans kids care about where they go to the bathroom. The LGBTQ movement cares because that’s how they advance their agenda.
- Joe Biden Dodged Half A Million In Taxes, And He Wants You To Pay Your ‘Fair Share’How can someone who avoided more than $500,000 in taxescontinue reading >
- Critical Race Theory Illuminates Democrats’ Master Plan To End Honest Elections In AmericaThose defending the traditional American view of electicontinue reading >
- What You Need To Know About Twitter’s Lawsuit Against Texas Up FridayOn May 7, lawyers for Twitter will square off against acontinue reading >