No matter how the Supreme Court votes on Obamacare, people will be angry. But it must stand by the Constitution, and that means canceling the Affordable Care Act.
YouTube removed a video of Rand Paul reading a question Chief Justice John Roberts twice suppressed during the Senate impeachment trial.
In a secret 1999 memo to Democrat senators, Joe Biden argued that senators had no obligation to call witnesses or hear live testimony during impeachment.
During the Senate impeachment trial Thursday, Chief Justice John Roberts declined to read a question submitted by Sen. Rand Paul which included the name of Eric Ciaramella.
The Post laid into the first lady after briefly approving of this year’s December decorations after chastising last year’s display as a “nightmare forest.”
All the left’s talk about Supreme Court legitimacy, stability, and precedent is an attempt to preserve their previous unconstitutional judicial power grabs — especially on abortion. Will Roberts fall for it?
Since when is the Supreme Court in the business of going beyond constitutionality to mind-reading as to why bureaucrats devise policies that are constitutional?
CNN legal analyst Joan Biskupic’s biography of Chief Justice John Roberts, ‘The Chief,’ is so preoccupied with disagreeing with the man that it doesn’t provide much insight into Roberts’s life and rulings.
Maybe ‘Obamacare’ should be renamed ‘Robertscare’ for the justice who went out of his way to save the individual mandate.
In the feud between President Trump and Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, both are wrong. Judges aren’t partisan hacks, but they do have different approaches to jurisprudence.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts’ attempt to defend the independence of the judiciary, in light of President Trump’s comments that courts are politicized, did more harm than good.
Georgetown Law Professor Randy Barnett joins Federalist Radio to discuss the pros and cons of a potential Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
There is literally nothing in his record that justifies the smears and demagoguery he’s about to face.
If judges are a vindication of Trump, are they also a vindication of Mitch McConnell? And if so, does a good Supreme Court really compensate for a lousy Congress?
The plaintiffs in Trump v. Hawaii would have the Supreme Court invent a principle that the president’s powers are reduced when he says nasty things.
The ruling reaffirms the president’s broad power to restrict access to the country on national security grounds granted by the Immigration and National Security Act.
The Supreme Court has taken a constitutional provision intended to limit government power and turned it into a mandate for unlimited government power.
Liberals argue that it’s time to raise the mandate ‘tax’ to compel holdouts to participate. Once again, Obamacare’s imaginary tax becomes a penalty.
If I have to point to a moment that spawned the current annus horribilis, it would have to be John Roberts’s vindication of Obamacare on June 28, 2012.
- 5 Big Things Wrong With Biden’s Mask-Or-Vaccine UltimatumFrom being impractical to contradictory to just plain ocontinue reading >
- Would An Actual Potato Be Better At Hosting ‘Reliable Sources’ Than Brian Stelter?If potato head Brian Stelter finds an elementary maskincontinue reading >
- The 3 Biggest Anti-Israel Myths On Social Media, DebunkedWith the help of the corporate media, leftist celebriticontinue reading >