Roberts’ infidelity to the Constitution took him straight to bed with a seductive abortion lobby that whispered sweet nothings into his ear about what women want. He listened, and now vulnerable women will pay the price.
In keeping with his other unconstitutional maneuvers, the chief justice joined with SCOTUS’s leftists in June Medical Services v. Russo, authoring his own concurring opinion that betrays the Constitution, life, and women.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts is a politician — a politician who consistently makes laws, inconsistently applies the Constitution, and can’t be voted out of office.
The Supreme Court’s ruling obliterates any commonsense distinctions between the sexes and makes a defining of sex clearly subjective and superfluous.
The fact that four justices who complained that the court needed to hear Second Amendment cases passed on 10 chances to do so tells us much about the court’s ‘swing vote.’
The recent SCOTUS decision seems like an LGBT victory, but not so fast. By linking the rights of gay and transgender people to sex, the left has bound itself to whatever definition ‘sex’ takes on.
Contrary to the Supreme Court’s recent 5-4 opinion that cut against religious liberty, it now looks like church health guidelines were subjective.
As America’s cities burn and leftist sympathizers make headlines, the U.S. Supreme Court quietly passed a potentially horrendous ruling against religious freedom.
No matter how the Supreme Court votes on Obamacare, people will be angry. But it must stand by the Constitution, and that means canceling the Affordable Care Act.
YouTube removed a video of Rand Paul reading a question Chief Justice John Roberts twice suppressed during the Senate impeachment trial.
In a secret 1999 memo to Democrat senators, Joe Biden argued that senators had no obligation to call witnesses or hear live testimony during impeachment.
During the Senate impeachment trial Thursday, Chief Justice John Roberts declined to read a question submitted by Sen. Rand Paul which included the name of Eric Ciaramella.
The Post laid into the first lady after briefly approving of this year’s December decorations after chastising last year’s display as a “nightmare forest.”
All the left’s talk about Supreme Court legitimacy, stability, and precedent is an attempt to preserve their previous unconstitutional judicial power grabs — especially on abortion. Will Roberts fall for it?
Since when is the Supreme Court in the business of going beyond constitutionality to mind-reading as to why bureaucrats devise policies that are constitutional?
CNN legal analyst Joan Biskupic’s biography of Chief Justice John Roberts, ‘The Chief,’ is so preoccupied with disagreeing with the man that it doesn’t provide much insight into Roberts’s life and rulings.
Maybe ‘Obamacare’ should be renamed ‘Robertscare’ for the justice who went out of his way to save the individual mandate.
In the feud between President Trump and Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, both are wrong. Judges aren’t partisan hacks, but they do have different approaches to jurisprudence.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts’ attempt to defend the independence of the judiciary, in light of President Trump’s comments that courts are politicized, did more harm than good.
Georgetown Law Professor Randy Barnett joins Federalist Radio to discuss the pros and cons of a potential Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
- Monday Was A Big Day For Democrats, But You Probably Missed ItWith America's anti-Trump voters and allied reporters icontinue reading >
- Oprah Joins Plot To Convince Americans Their Country Is RacistThis effort to extend the 1619 reeducation program intocontinue reading >
- Only Tom Hanks Could Have Made New WWII Drama ‘Greyhound’No fictional horror will ever compare to standing in a continue reading >