Democrat presidential candidates, like most Americans, seem to be unaware that the bulk of wildlife conservation funding in this country comes from a healthy firearms industry.
With the nation’s widest-ranging so-called ‘red-flag’ law, Newsom is demonstrating he’s more interested in settling political scores and pursuing far-left ideologies than actually governing.
Thirty years into the national debate over semi-automatic rifles and ammunition magazines designed for defensive purposes, the only thing that has changed is the openness with which Democrats demonstrate their determination to prohibit the private ownership of firearms.
There are no two ways about it. As long as there is a background check system for gun purchases, Democrats will try to transform it into a firearm registry they can use to confiscate guns.
All top 10 Democrat presidential candidates advocate banning the most popular rifles and ammunition magazines in America. Five don’t want to wait for their current owners to die.
Speculations about defeating ‘the NRA’ may titillate the mob, but even if NRA disappeared, there are still 100 million American gun owners, their family members, and their friends.
During the third round of Democratic presidential debates, Beto O’Rourke said if he is elected president the government would ‘take your AR-15s.’ He said the opposite less than two years ago.
Studying and addressing behavioral patterns should be an immediate priority of Congress, the media, and others dedicated to preventing mass shootings.
These are the changes Republicans should make to federal gun laws, once they again hold the White House and both houses of Congress.
Should women be permitted to protect their own bodies? Or should they be forced to passively endure an attack until an authorized protector from the government can ride to their rescue?
It’s not only to prevent a Democrat landslide in 2020. It’s because Democrats will settle for nothing less than gun confiscation.
The media should stop using phrases like ‘mandatory gun buybacks.’ What Democrats propose is the first-ever national confiscation of guns.
‘I got the gun for that purpose, but I never thought I would really have to use it,’ said a women who shot at the men who tried to rob her at 2:30 a.m Tuesday morning.
Gun rights defenders are willing to genuinely compromise. But gun control advocates do not negotiate in good faith, creating bad policy with no logical end.
Even on the most secure college campus, the police response to an active shooter is measured in minutes. But when seconds matter, it is up to students and faculty to defend their own lives.
In the 1970s, the NRA changed its mission. If the NRA wants to be as powerful as Democrats claim it is, it’s going to have to change again.
The habitually dishonest Bill Clinton is mischaracterizing his ‘ban’ to help Democrats impose one with far more severe consequences.
An off-duty firefighter carrying his own concealed weapon held the armed suspect at gunpoint until police arrived.
If gun control advocates are really worried about fatality numbers, restrictive firearm policies are not the place to start.
For those serious about saving lives, white nationalism needs to mean something more than just distasteful opinions, and mass shootings must remain within the context of the larger problem of gun violence.
- Alex Vindman Is Living, Breathing Proof That The Deep State Exists, And It Is CorruptDemocrats and the Deep State have elevated more policy continue reading >
- The Suspension Of Ohio State’s Chase Young Is Everything That’s Wrong With The NCAAThe NCAA's outdated and unfair financial rules punish pcontinue reading >
- 44 Classics You Won’t Find On Disney Plus (Yet)With an eye towards great storytelling that families cacontinue reading >