The worst thing about all this is not that NBC reporter Katy Tur apparently has no idea about basic American expenses and their tradeoffs.
In honor of Nancy Pelosi and Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s views that $1,000 is a ‘crumb,’ here’s Lucille Bluth on what costs lots and lots of money.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol are sharing talking points this week in attacks on the tax alterations Republicans finally managed to pass in December.
Perhaps the most dramatic advance for school choice in 2017 was accomplished through the federal child tax credit expansion. It illuminates needed improvements to parent choice.
In Democratic-majority states across the nation, state legislators are flailing blindly to find a way around the reduced federal tax deduction for state and local taxes.
Some of the first substantial results of the 2017 tax overhaul have arrived, and this state is seeing green.
Congress still refuses to eat its policy spinach, following the path of least resistance in making easy choices rather than tough ones.
Shortly before departing for their Christmas break, lawmakers of both parties voted to waive provisions that would have led to federal spending reductions over the coming decade.
Liberals mocked new tax cuts for ‘only’ allowing middle-class Americans to keep an average of $1,000 more of their money a year. Excuse me. We can do a lot with that money.
The same people whom rail on Trump for every perceived social justice slight fail to recognize the financial prosperity this administration has ushered in for minority groups.
Like Obamacare, people don’t know what’s in the tax reform bill. But unlike Obamacare, they’re going to be pleasantly surprised.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act cuts rates for most tax brackets, substantially reduces business taxes, increases the standard deduction, and eliminates many tax loopholes and deductions.
The rhetoric says the credit is beautifully pro-life and, in taking it away, Congress is practically consigning children to lives in orphanages or being snuffed out in abortion. But is that accurate?
If the goal is to pay for tax cuts, that could be done much more fairly, with better profit for students and Americans, and with bigger savings.
The idea that allowing people to keep more of their money represents the ‘worst bill in… history’ tells people all they need to know about the current Democratic Party.
Ben Domenech covers this week’s flood of new on the Federalist Radio Hour including the snow ball of sexual assault allegation, the tax bill, and more.
While a certain amount of taxation is necessary, we shouldn’t kid ourselves about its true nature. It’s a form of coerced taking.
Liberals aren’t peddling typical political euphemisms. They are corroding language, and we shouldn’t allow it to be normalized.
Neither party wants to reduce spending—a bad sign for future generations, who will pay the price for current leaders’ profligate ways.
- 6 Reasons Your Right-Wing Friend Isn’t Coming To Your Side On Gun ControlThere are several reasons Second Amendment advocates arcontinue reading >
- How A Plea Reversal From Michael Flynn Could Uncover More Federal CorruptionDid Robert Mueller’s office withhold other evidence icontinue reading >
- Is A Former Feinstein Staffer Running Fusion GPS’s Post-Election Steele Dossier Operation?A former FBI agent who served as one of Sen. Dianne Feicontinue reading >