If a legislature ratifies a constitutional amendment, but that amendment does not exist, has the legislature actually done anything?
A recent Washington Post essay declares Alexander Hamilton would support Donald Trump’s impeachment, but it wildly misunderstands — and misrepresents — Hamilton’s writings.
Restoring circuit duties to the court would naturally decrease tenure on the bench without weakening the judiciary’s independence or adding more justices in a partisan war.
Impeachment now looks more like an example of that ancient term: a partisan traveshamockery.
By refusing to send articles of impeachment to the Senate, Pelosi is asserting the primacy of the Democrat-controlled House over the GOP-led Senate.
If Nancy Pelosi truly believed Democrats made the case that Trump was an “urgent threat,” she wouldn’t be so desperate to avoid a Senate impeachment trial.
It’s official. President Donald Trump has officially become the third president to be impeached in the weakest impeachment case ever Read Full Article >
In Spokane, 649 rape kits are awaiting attention, an opioid crisis is raging, and a serial killer hasn’t been caught, yet the city is throwing the book at a pastor who objects to a sexual minstrel show performed for children.
Scarily, the permanent lies of totalitarianism — ‘survive at any price’ and ‘only material results matter’ — seem ascendant today in American politics.
By putting constitutionally ineligible officers into the presidential succession, the Congress in 1947 guaranteed a court fight should a double vacancy ever occur.
The U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights ‘will investigate whether the University expresses an unlawful preference for women in its employment and hiring practices.’
Places of worship must be able to make their own determinations on who to hire and why. New laws in New York are wrong and must be overturned.
Our Founding Fathers were keenly aware about the risks of governing solely by majority rule, which is why they gave us a constitutional republic laden with checks and balances.
The rhetoric of rights is appealing. Label whatever you want a ‘right’ and you tip the scales in your favor. However appealing the tactic may be, however, is conceptually incorrect and politically dangerous.
Privileged bureaucrats are so high on their self-righteousness that they actually think they’re protecting the Constitution by obstructing the foreign policy of the elected president.
All the left’s talk about Supreme Court legitimacy, stability, and precedent is an attempt to preserve their previous unconstitutional judicial power grabs — especially on abortion. Will Roberts fall for it?
While they might be convenient and sometimes in need, these are not ‘rights’ that warrant government infringement on the rights of others to secure them.
From the internet fever swamps of the left-wing commentariat, plans have emerged to remove Brett Kavanaugh from the Supreme Court by any means necessary.
Numerous Supreme Court victories and the inspiring growth of the early church show Christians shouldn’t place their faith in government power, but in the Constitution — and God above all.
Creeping government control is nothing new, but the DOJ’s recent disregard for the Second and Fourth Amendments shows old protections against abuses of power will wear thin without public vigilance.
- As The Impeachment Trial Begins, Democrats Are Losing Their MindsHaving realized their impeachment gambit is failing, Decontinue reading >
- Why Criminal Prosecution Might Be The Least Of Ilhan Omar’s Legal ConcernsRep. Ilhan Omar needs competent immigration counsel to continue reading >
- Schiff Likely Mischaracterized Parnas Evidence During Impeachment TrialThe lead House impeachment manager, Rep. Adam Schiff ofcontinue reading >