The main controversy of asking about citizenship on the census stems from the much bigger points of what it means to be American and how a representative republic in the 21st century is supposed to work.
Since when is the Supreme Court in the business of going beyond constitutionality to mind-reading as to why bureaucrats devise policies that are constitutional?
Counting illegal immigrants in the census would warp our elections and flies in the face of any common-sense interpretation of the U.S. Constitution.
Our country should be governed with political power evenly allocated on a ‘one voter, one vote’ basis. However, to do that, we will need the data from the citizenship question on the census.
The administration is accused of politicizing the count, but Democrats’ goal is to blur the line between citizens and non-citizens to up their House seats.
Democrats have found a sneaky way to tilt the political playing field in their favor without having to reform the immigration system.
Citizenship is a normal thing to include in a major government survey, hence why virtually all major government surveys do. The census has since 1820.
A simple question on the U.S. census has sent Democrats into a tizzy to obscure their political advantages of not knowing citizenship status.
The biggest current winners of a practice nearly as old as the republic are black and Hispanic members of Congress. Do Democrats want to reduce their numbers?
A look at history will show how the Supreme Court’s liberal justices abandoned their principles in pursuit of a purely political win for Democrats.
A taskforce is condemning Trump for not collecting census data on gender identity. Because freedom from government intrusion no longer matters.
- Let’s Stop Pretending Every Impeachment Witness Is A Selfless HeroIt’s become clear that some witnesses in the impeachmcontinue reading >
- Vindman Just Admitted To Leaking To The Anti-Trump WhistleblowerWhen pressed on who Vindman spoke with about the call, continue reading >
- Vindman Exaggerated His Resume In Prepared Congressional StatementVindman claimed to be the “principal advisor to the Ncontinue reading >