‘Nationwide injunctions mean that each of the more than 600 federal district judges in the United States can freeze a law or regulation throughout the country — regardless of whether the other 599 disagree.’
Some on the left have already called the Supreme Court’s ruling an endorsement of discrimination. But people who make such accusations clearly didn’t read either the original executive order or the court’s opinion.
The plaintiffs in Trump v. Hawaii would have the Supreme Court invent a principle that the president’s powers are reduced when he says nasty things.
The Supreme Court officially overturned a 1944 case affirming the right of then-President Franklin Roosevelt to forcibly relocate American citizens of Japanese descent to government-run internment camps.
The ruling reaffirms the president’s broad power to restrict access to the country on national security grounds granted by the Immigration and National Security Act.
Joseph Tartakovsky’s new book, ‘The Lives of the Constitution,’ chronicles the lives and works of 10 Americans who altered or contributed to our supreme law.
Students belonging to a rocketry club at a California community college won’t be allowed to compete in NASA’s highly competitive Student Launch project due to a newly enacted state travel ban.
U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson wrote in an order that suspended the latest version of the president’s travel ban that it ‘plainly discriminates based on nationality.’
Although the order is more carefully crafted following months of review, Trump’s opponents will still fight it. But that doesn’t mean it will work.
A new poll released Wednesday indicates that restricting migration from majority-Muslim countries is a lot more popular than the mainstream media would have us believe.
The Supreme Court has substantially upheld a significant part of the executive power by which President Trump’s immigration order was issued.
Last week, California added four more states to its ‘travel ban,’ including Texas, claiming those states’ religious freedom laws amount to discrimination.
If our system of government devolves into a political tug-of-war between the executive branch and the judiciary, we all lose.
The furor over Trump’s executive order on immigration isn’t about the Constitution. It’s about liberals’ contempt for Trump.
A federal judge in Hawaii relied on his feelings and flawed interpretation of Trump’s campaign rhetoric to block his latest travel ban.
America’s top officials and doctors are playing fast and loose with Ebola information, and that’s dangerous.
The Ebola travel ban debate reminds us that the fatal conceit of technocracy is the assumption that dynamic systems like human society are controllable.
The World Health Organization just announced that Senegal has “ended Ebola transmission” within its borders. The country instituted a travel ban in August.
If you think blocking travel from countries riddled with Ebola is racist, you might be a TV talking head.
- 3 Times Media Falsely Claimed Russiagate Transparency Would End The RepublicAs the media carry water for sources who selectively recontinue reading >
- HBO’s ‘Chernobyl’ Drives Home The Deadly Perils Of StatismHBO’s excellent new miniseries is a harrowing look atcontinue reading >
- New York Times Admits Obama Admin Deployed Multiple Spies Against Trump Campaign In 2016The New York Times admitted on Thursday that the Obama continue reading >