This executive order combined with Supreme Court precedent amounts to imposing a national sexual orientation and gender identity law on the entire country.
What Lambda portrays as discrimination based on gender identity is not sex discrimination under the reasoning of Bostock.
What many commentators have missed is that the Bostock opinion provides the basis for the argument that single-sex bathrooms and locker rooms violate Title VII.
Allowing biological males, with inherent physical advantages, to compete against females threatens to undo all of the progress that Title IX has made.
The decision on transgender employees has delivered a blow to the president and party that sold Neil Gorsuch as what they accomplished in electing Donald Trump.
The Supreme Court’s ruling obliterates any commonsense distinctions between the sexes and makes a defining of sex clearly subjective and superfluous.
It’s laughable to argue that anyone who wrote — or read — the Civil Rights Act of 1964 understood ‘sex’ to mean anything other than male or female.
The ruling will lead to a tsunami of polarizing court cases and further degradation of Americans’ natural rights to free speech, to free association, and to worshipping God as their consciences require.
If what Trump’s administration is doing is ‘erasing’ LGBT people, then being erased must be the same thing as equality and assimilation — and that looks like progress to me.
In an unusual amicus brief, a group of people who used to be transgender say that not only should gender identity not be a protected class, but that it’s an imaginary construct of traumatized minds.
What the Sixth Circuit did by unilaterally imposing a trendy notion that sex and biology aren’t related was an attempt to silence one point of view. The Supreme Court can correct that.
Employees can allege discrimination and receive money as a result, without ever having to prove that discrimination actually took place. This encourages more frivolous complaints.
A brief primer on federal employment law exposes the error sweeping the judicial system.
The decision rests on a firm and universal understanding of both ‘woman’ and ‘man,’ the kind of black and white labels the LGBT community typically avoids.
Monday, the Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals on whether sexual orientation discrimination is illegal under Title VII.
The judges telegraphed pretty clearly their view that the government could force Harris Funeral Homes to allow Anthony Stevens to present as a woman at work.
The Obama administration’s Title IX regulation changes are nothing short of an attempt to rewrite this venerable statute without congressional oversight.
- 15 Insane Things In Democrats’ H.R. 1 Bill To Corrupt Elections ForeverHere are just some of the unconstitutional, absurd, nakcontinue reading >
- In 8-1 SCOTUS Ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts Is The Only One To Side Against Christian Students Whose Free Speech Was TrampledChief Justice John Roberts was the only dissenter in thcontinue reading >
- Demi Lovato Calls Gender Reveal Parties ‘Transphobic’Demi Lovato finds pink and blue offensive, saying she bcontinue reading >