Why do Democrats keep losing on climate change? This is what happens when science is hijacked in pursuit of ideologically driven economic policies.
So what are the consequences of Donald Trump pulling America out of the Paris Agreement on global warming? Bad news: the planet is going to die.
Democracy dies in hyperbole.
Washington Post blogger Jennifer Rubin used to hate the Paris climate deal. Then Trump agreed with her. Now she loves it. What changed?
Obama’s Paris climate legacy lived by his pen and should die by Trump’s.
If Glacier National Park is melting because of global warming, you would expect to hear how much temperatures have increased there. Don’t hold your breath.
Environmentalists scream about fossil fuels and carbon dioxide, yet they’re afraid to even mention the two best alternatives.
In Sunday’s edition of the cartoon strip, Dilbert savages climate change alarmist Michael Mann, who in response has been throwing a fit on Twitter for several days.
In a recent interview with Refinery 29, Gloria Steinem said climate change could have been prevented if more women had aborted their children.
On the eve of the Climate March, the New York Times ran Stephens’s first column for them, and it sent the climate mob on a virtual stampede with torches ablaze.
Bret Stephens penned a tepid piece that makes the rational suggestion that both sides of the climate-change debate should hear hear each other out. The Left’s reaction? ‘Burn the witch!’
The organizers of the ‘March for Science’ follow the legacy of substituting a political narrative for the distinctive language and methods of science.
Arguments in favor of Tesla’s subsidies would make a whole lot less sense if the tech media had the slightest familiarity with pro-free-market economics.
Even if regulations like those in the Paris Climate Treaty could somehow significantly reduce global warming, they could hurt people and the planet.
The Paris Climate Treaty is a heat-seeking missile aimed solely at American jobs that will do nothing to reduce global warming. Why would we deploy it?
The Los Angeles Times tries to rewrite history by claiming that the Valdez struck Bligh Reef because the Columbia Glacier had been shedding icebergs.
All taxpayers have an investment in climate change. We have the right to give an opinion on the subject—even if we don’t adhere to the prevailing orthodoxy.
It all just goes to show how government regulation can be silent, but deadly.
Texas Rep. Lamar Smith, chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, has accused the EPA of cooking the scientific books to justify oppressive and costly regulations.
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt is absolutely correct about carbon dioxide, and it’s the media who don’t understand the scientific issues.
- 6 Reasons Your Right-Wing Friend Isn’t Coming To Your Side On Gun ControlThere are several reasons Second Amendment advocates arcontinue reading >
- How The Media Enable Rep. Adam Schiff’s Russian Bot Conspiracy TheoriesFor more than a year, Adam Schiff has been hopping to acontinue reading >
- Watch CNN’s Scripted Anti-Gun Town Hall Go Completely Off The RailsCNN's Jake Tapper intervened to protect a Democrat senacontinue reading >