Last month’s Gallup poll found climate change was the ninth most important issue, coming in at a mere 3 percent. That result also combines climate change with the environment and pollution.
Concerns about the future are certainly justified, but for the present, a strategy of wait, watch, and grow is the best way to deal with global warming.
Liberal, coastal elites in the mainstream media are woefully out of touch with what actual Democratic voters care about when it comes to the environment.
Some of the celebrities rushing to blame climate change who lost their homes actually lived in a region known for regular fires.
The fact that wildfires are no more frequent or severe during recent decades is remarkable considering anthropogenic changes that should make wildfires more prevalent.
A publication that has built a reputation for fair and non-biased reporting has lately been inserting leftist propaganda into its energy and environment coverage.
The left has been claiming Hurricane Florence is a higher power’s vengeance on America for our wickedness.
What’s an alarmist to do in light of all of the improvements in conservation while reducing poverty? Go after the size of families in impoverished countries, of course.
A recent video of a starving polar bear tugged at the heartstrings of global warming alarmists. But the fact is, polar bears are doing just fine.
A Stanford professor is suing other scientists for critiquing his work in favor of ‘renewable energy.’ That’s not how science works.
Joe Nickell should approach Al Gore with the same level of credulity he approaches an alleged haunting or UFO sighting. But it seems that he is a selective skeptic.
A climate scientist at the Department of Interior claims the Trump administration reassigned him for talking about climate change.
Individuals who choose to have fewer kids should by all means proceed. Meanwhile, pro-family conservatives shall inherit the future.
In his New York Magazine article, ‘The Uninhabitable Earth,’ doomsayer David Wallace-Wells issues numerous dire warnings that aren’t supported by science.
Since Trump’s Rose Garden announcement that the United States would pull out of the Paris climate agreement, world leaders have been whining.
You’d think the 97 percent of scientists who supposedly all agree about climate change would eagerly line up to vanquish climate deniers—but apparently not.
‘How G.O.P. Leaders Came to View Climate Change as Fake Science’ is The New York Times’ latest anthropological study of the strange species known as ‘Republicans.’
The columnist who wrote an entire column in 2011 that derisively compared global warming with religion now believes that humans are responsible for climate change.
Your hysterics surrounding the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris global warming arrangement have finally driven it home for us: this isn’t working.
The man who has satirized corporate culture and groupthink for nearly 30 years is agitating the groupthink on both sides of the climate change debate.
- 3 Times Media Falsely Claimed Russiagate Transparency Would End The RepublicAs the media carry water for sources who selectively recontinue reading >
- HBO’s ‘Chernobyl’ Drives Home The Deadly Perils Of StatismHBO’s excellent new miniseries is a harrowing look atcontinue reading >
- New York Times Admits Obama Admin Deployed Multiple Spies Against Trump Campaign In 2016The New York Times admitted on Thursday that the Obama continue reading >