A climate scientist at the Department of Interior claims the Trump administration reassigned him for talking about climate change.
Individuals who choose to have fewer kids should by all means proceed. Meanwhile, pro-family conservatives shall inherit the future.
In his New York Magazine article, ‘The Uninhabitable Earth,’ doomsayer David Wallace-Wells issues numerous dire warnings that aren’t supported by science.
Since Trump’s Rose Garden announcement that the United States would pull out of the Paris climate agreement, world leaders have been whining.
You’d think the 97 percent of scientists who supposedly all agree about climate change would eagerly line up to vanquish climate deniers—but apparently not.
‘How G.O.P. Leaders Came to View Climate Change as Fake Science’ is The New York Times’ latest anthropological study of the strange species known as ‘Republicans.’
The columnist who wrote an entire column in 2011 that derisively compared global warming with religion now believes that humans are responsible for climate change.
Your hysterics surrounding the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris global warming arrangement have finally driven it home for us: this isn’t working.
The man who has satirized corporate culture and groupthink for nearly 30 years is agitating the groupthink on both sides of the climate change debate.
So what are the consequences of Donald Trump pulling America out of the Paris Agreement on global warming? Bad news: the planet is going to die.
If Glacier National Park is melting because of global warming, you would expect to hear how much temperatures have increased there. Don’t hold your breath.
Even if regulations like those in the Paris Climate Treaty could somehow significantly reduce global warming, they could hurt people and the planet.
The Paris Climate Treaty is a heat-seeking missile aimed solely at American jobs that will do nothing to reduce global warming. Why would we deploy it?
All taxpayers have an investment in climate change. We have the right to give an opinion on the subject—even if we don’t adhere to the prevailing orthodoxy.
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt is absolutely correct about carbon dioxide, and it’s the media who don’t understand the scientific issues.
The scientific community and media outlets that claimed Trump will silence scientists are now attacking one of their own for speaking up.
When I challenged him about the ‘hottest year on record,’ a New York Times reporter explained that his readers are too dumb to understand numbers.
When you read a science report claiming that 2016 was the hottest year on record, you might expect that you will get numbers. And you would be wrong.
After the election, there were reports of EPA employees breaking down in tears and Energy Department staffers needing counseling. It’s not because they care about the environment.
Correctly acknowledging the climate change debate is enough to get EPA nominee Scott Pruitt branded a ‘denialist.’ Why would anyone take such a clownish ideology seriously?
- Donald Trump Needs To Not Be President YesterdayWe're done with the 'take what we can get' phase of Doncontinue reading >
- Trump Spoke Truth About ‘Both Sides’ In Charlottesville, And The Media Lost Their MindsThe media behavior in the wake of this press conferencecontinue reading >
- The ‘Peanuts’ Football Trick Explains Why Conservatives Keep Quiet About White SupremacyIt shouldn’t come as a surprise when those who are incontinue reading >