The ACLU’s denouncement of the new Title IX rules is a disappointing chapter in the history of a once-great defender of civil liberties for all.
The complaint seeks to castigate the commander-in-chief instead of laying out a legal basis for Honduran citizens to sue our government under the U.S. Constitution. There is no legal basis.
The Senate hearing involving Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations against Brett Kavanaugh ended in a he-said/she-said impasse. A defamation lawsuit might remedy that.
Both our legal and moral traditions provide crucial principles to guide us in such cases, principles that obviously need revisiting. As a believer in the Bible, and an attorney, I submit seven brief thoughts.
God-willing, Brett Kavanaugh will serve on the court for a long time and his name will be on rulings. It was important for President Trump, as the leader of the United States, to apologize to protect the institution’s legitimacy.
As a voter who recognizes the unfortunate realities of our politics, I believe supporting Trump has become the responsible choice.
Anyone who thinks today’s China is an open and free society, unlike the Communist China under Chairman Mao, should read Fan’s letter word for word.
In the case of Kavanaugh, the ACLU has abandoned its mission as the ‘nation’s premier defender of the rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.’
SUBSCRIBE TO THE FEDERALIST RADIO HOUR HERE. On this episode of the Federalist Radio Hour, Ben Domenech and Inez Stepman Read Full Article >
Women are not so morally craven that we need to punish some politically convenient scapegoat for the sins of completely different men. That’s not justice.
Does an unprovable and uncorroborated allegation that Kavanaugh did a terrible thing as a teenager disqualify him from sitting on the Supreme Court?
Senate Democrats have managed to reduce Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court confirmation to an absurd show trial that no one can win.
It’s not nice or politically correct to say, but people do sometimes lie to get money, revenge, power, attention, or political advantage. False allegations of assault have been documented.
I cannot accept a world in which my sons will be raised under the tyranny of a lawless, vindictive society that wants to oppress men in the name of equality for women.
If we leave weighing the evidence behind for punishing people based on a ‘reasonable suspicion,’ the left will increase its use of character assassination.
A Senate star chamber full of grandstanding senators on both sides will not elucidate what happened four decades ago, when all people involved were minors, and the accuser is unclear on the details.
Regardless of how unfair and unjust it is to the person who survived, the person accused has an equal right to a fair and just trial.
The frenzy surrounding allegations of abuse by a coach at Ohio State University is a prime example of the danger of taking the law into our own hands.
Judge John McConnell said that he could ‘find no reason at all why the result was Mr. Doe’s expulsion. The only inference [is] . . . gender played a role.’
A male student has accused a female student of sexual assault, claiming he was too drunk to consent to sexual activity.
- 7 Ways The Mueller Report Exposed The Media’s ‘Bombshell’ Fake News StoriesWhen Special Counsel Robert Mueller released his 448-pacontinue reading >
- CNN Can’t Do The Mueller Report MathLook at this chyron from CNN last night. Notice anythincontinue reading >
- Maggie Haberman Thinks It’s Weird For The White House To Play ‘Edelweiss’Perhaps Haberman believes ‘Edelweiss’ in the moderncontinue reading >