Both parties should aim to reestablish checks and balances that have been piddled away over the past six decades, so Congress can reassert its proper role in American governance.
Rejecting the climate-change panic-mongers might have been one of the smartest things American voters have done over the past two decades.
What’s an alarmist to do in light of all of the improvements in conservation while reducing poverty? Go after the size of families in impoverished countries, of course.
The world’s largest science organization is bestowing a top honor on a climate propagandist who spends lots of his time making ridiculous, inflammatory comments.
Trump’s first year in office has turned out much better than expected, but don’t let that blind us to some of the long-term costs of Trumpism.
The National Security Strategy to be released on Monday will emphasize the importance of balancing energy security with economic development and environmental protection.
A Stanford professor is suing other scientists for critiquing his work in favor of ‘renewable energy.’ That’s not how science works.
Democrats may have read The New York Times’ analysis of the connection between hurricanes and climate change and realized scientists know very little about it.
The New York Times informed us the connection between climate change and hurricanes wasn’t clear. That’s the kind of skepticism that gets serious people branded ‘deniers.’
While thousands of displaced Texans brave hurricane Harvey and continue to flee from deadly, rising flood waters, members of the media are busy politicizing the disaster.
Joe Nickell should approach Al Gore with the same level of credulity he approaches an alleged haunting or UFO sighting. But it seems that he is a selective skeptic.
A climate scientist at the Department of Interior claims the Trump administration reassigned him for talking about climate change.
A disturbing number of the world’s nations will not be replacing themselves population-wise in coming generations. This is serious, and Elon Musk knows it.
Individuals who choose to have fewer kids should by all means proceed. Meanwhile, pro-family conservatives shall inherit the future.
In the vast majority of cases, how many kids you have just won’t affect any environmental outcomes. Plus the study on which these articles were based is junk science.
In his New York Magazine article, ‘The Uninhabitable Earth,’ doomsayer David Wallace-Wells issues numerous dire warnings that aren’t supported by science.
If they can’t reduce the current number of people on earth, climate alarmists can teach young people that reproducing is amongst the worst of moral sins. But they’re wrong.
You’d think the 97 percent of scientists who supposedly all agree about climate change would eagerly line up to vanquish climate deniers—but apparently not.
Maybe the summer’s best sandwich produces a substantial carbon footprint—but I’m pretty sure we need food to live. Print magazines? Not so much.
‘How G.O.P. Leaders Came to View Climate Change as Fake Science’ is The New York Times’ latest anthropological study of the strange species known as ‘Republicans.’
- In Papers Saying Papadopoulos Lied, FBI Reveals It’s Either Lying Or IncompetentTo say that George Papadopoulos’ lies (or inaccurate continue reading >
- These Screenshots Show How Google Shadowbans Conservative And Pro-Trump ContentNew membership on my Facebook page has stopped dead. Mycontinue reading >
- CNN Just Sued The Government To Get The Names And Addresses Of Manafort JurorsThe anti-Trump cable network has a history of doxxing tcontinue reading >