The U.S. shouldn’t be complacent after winning the first round of the trade war. China is a formidable strategic competitor and will remain so for many years to come.
Past behavior from the major European powers has shown that, unlike Washington, they are far more eager to appease Iran, and far more persistent.
For the first time in a long time, the United States and China are striking a deal to set up better trade relations for both countries.
After adding up the expensive externalities and the social cost, cheap stuff from China does not look as affordable as it does on the store shelf or the online cart.
The U.S. and China have such different economic and political systems and different sets of values. We may have to settle our differences through other means, beyond a trade agreement.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi procrastinated on crafting a solution with the White House on the U.S.-Canada-Mexico agreement for months to coincide with impeachment.
Yesterday, the EU’s Court of Justice, the highest court in the EU, ruled that Jewish products made in contested areas of Israel must bear consumer warning labels.
It’s unthinkable that any other great power would get away without any backlash from either Islamic powers, Islamic civil society, or jihadist groups. And that is one of the biggest puzzles in foreign policy worth probing.
The issue of consent in Northern Ireland could keep Boris Johnson from obtaining the consent of Parliament for his new agreement.
Western companies are walking a very thin line between losing access to the Chinese market and losing their customer base everywhere else — and this can’t last forever.
Free traders have the same view of trade war as Quakers do of real war: that it is never the answer.
Free trade with communist nations will defeat every law we have. In a free market with an unfree nation, we have created a competition of systems, and bad systems will drive out good.
It was the conventional wisdom that China, due to the burden of its global responsibilities, would become a responsible stakeholder and global citizen through greater market access. That’s not happening.
A top legislative priority for the White House, the agreement was signed by the United States, Mexico, and Canada on Nov. 30 of last year but has stalled in Congress.
New York Times writer Binyamin Appelbaum joins Federalist Radio to discuss his new book, “The Economists’ Hour: False Prophets, Free Markets, and the Fracture of Society.”
Lord Conrad Black joins Ben Domenech on the Federalist Radio Hour to discuss media and how newspapers have failed to adjust to the Internet age.
While we hoped freer trade with the West would lead China toward liberal democracy, the result has been an increasingly oppressive government.
The EU may begin targeting businesses in Israel in the name of neutrality, but the ramifications will be anything but neutral.
The popular narrative goes that because President Trump launched a trade war against China, China has retaliated by tariffing agriculture products from red states that voted for Trump. False.
- IG Report Proves Obama Administration Spied On Trump Campaign Big TimeThe IG report established that the Obama administrationcontinue reading >
- ‘Ya’ll Elitists Are Dumb’: CNN Creates Yet Another Unintended Ad For TrumpTo Wilson, Ali, and Lemon, it's far more important to econtinue reading >
- Trump Is Right. Adam Schiff Has Not Paid For Damaging The Country With Years Of LiesSchiff was not telling the truth when he kept dripping continue reading >