During his standup routine in Dallas, Texas on Friday, comedian Eddie Griffin encouraged audience members to assassinate President Trump.
It’s clear the judges went through the exercise of writing an opinion so they could get to the outcome they wanted. The problem is, the outcome they wanted is, legally speaking, wrong.
The executive order by the Trump administration on immigration led to an urgent desire to proclaim there is no terrorism threat from immigrants. False.
Because of the administration’s excessive haste to act and media personalities’ haste to judge, reasonable discussion of American crisis migration policy has been all but snuffed out.
The refugee crisis and its consequences represent a string of failures on the part of multiple actors.
After President Trump signed an executive order on Friday pausing immigration from seven countries, people lost their minds. Here are some of the most insane reactions thus far.
Unlike Obama and Kerry’s approach to diplomacy, which starts with what the people on the other side of the table want or will accept, Rex Tillerson starts with what America needs.
Ben Wallace’s call for public vigilance is both ironic and impossible given a pervasive culture in Britain that demands absolute tolerance for all things Muslim.
If TSA searches often violate the Fourth Amendment without yielding security benefits to the country, they need to make changes to their safety procedures.
The question we must ask now is: ‘Will the presence of a woman in combat negatively affect an infantry unit?’ This is the only question that matters in this debate.
‘How wrong are these elites, at least as it relates to the rest of the country? Look for a moment at the most glaring foreign policy failures of the past 15 years.’
‘Comprehensive’ immigration reform would only serve special interests, and building a wall is needlessly expensive. There’s a better way.
For a job that requires laser-sharp judgment, Michael Flynn seriously misjudges major world leaders like Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Rebeccah Heinrichs, foreign policy expert and Hudson Institute fellow, joins Ben Domenech on The Federalist Radio Hour.
Liberal interventionism and neoconservatism offer us the same militaristic approaches. It’s time for a new, more thoughtful approach to our foreign policy.
It wouldn’t require a nuclear weapon. And it may be more imminent and real a threat than most Americans are willing to realize.
Surveying the foreign policy looming landscape, it’s not at all clear that either of the two frontrunners are up to the task.
As was the case with other recent high-profile terror cases, the FBI was tipped off to Ahmad Rahami’s radicalization. What’s going on here?
Liberal politicians and members of the media want to deny ISIS’s ability to attack America because doing so gives them an excuse for inaction.
- Robert Mueller Has Been Botching Investigations Since The Anthrax AttacksSpecial counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into thecontinue reading >
- Why A Good Father Prepares His Sons For WarWill Leitch’s father failed him that day. No man teaccontinue reading >
- Why The Stormy Daniels Story Is A Sign Of The ApocalypseIt looks like Donald Trump's lawyer paid a porn star tocontinue reading >