No U.S. court would permit Democrats’ tactic of designating a witness to testify and then allowing that witness to conduct a surprise cross-examination of an attorney for the other side.
In Tom Friedman’s world, a Cabinet officer’s faithful execution of a president’s policies after private disagreement is both ‘cowardly’ and ‘slimy,’ not to mention cause for eternal damnation.
Vindman publicly and gratuitously questioned the policies of his commander in chief and did so in a partisan political setting. The U.S. military should nip that in the bud.
Alex Vindman’s testimony about the July 25 call between the two presidents does not add any new facts. So, what does he say? He offers his opinions about the wisdom of the call. That’s it.
- Media Reaction To Yamiche Alcindor Dustup With Trump Shows Why Their Approval Ratings Are LowHer peers rushed to defend her, but Alcindor has a traccontinue reading >
- It’s Not The Federal Government’s Fault New York Doesn’t Have More Ventilators, It’s Andrew Cuomo’sRather than produce good results for patients, overbearcontinue reading >
- Rachel Maddow Calls The Timely Arrival Of Navy Hospital Ships ‘Nonsense’Rachel Maddow said President Trump was lying when he sacontinue reading >