When a president or legislature is faced with following either a court ruling they know has no constitutional basis or the actual Constitution, they should heed Hamilton’s advice.
President Trump has plenty of qualified, pro-life nominees in tow. Yet that’s not enough, because getting them confirmed has been nearly impossible.
If our system of government devolves into a political tug-of-war between the executive branch and the judiciary, we all lose.
A federal judge in Hawaii relied on his feelings and flawed interpretation of Trump’s campaign rhetoric to block his latest travel ban.
Democratic state legislators want to require presidential candidates to publicly disclose their tax returns. There’s a constitutional problem with that.
The Supreme Court’s ability to issue a binding opinion on any subject that no one else could overturn is inconsistent with the checks and balances the Framers crafted.
To truly merit a place on the Supreme Court—whether for Merrick Garland or someone else—the next appointee must understand the constitutional power he or she exercises.
- Left In Denial Blames Evergreen’s Bat-Wielding Student Mobs On Professor Who Opposed RacismNoah Berlatsky's complaint here is, seriously, that Brecontinue reading >
- The Migrant Crisis Is About More Than Just KidsThe Mexican cartels uses migrants to flood the zone andcontinue reading >
- 6 Revelations From ‘The Swamp’ Documentary That Show Just How Dirty DC IsFour million people have watched the first three episodcontinue reading >