Let the president, as he is charged to do under the Constitution, consider whether the outcome in this case is one where justice wears a countenance too sanguinary and cruel.
The whole reason the nation has been subjected to the traumatic Brett Kavanaugh confirmation is because liberals know the Supreme Court is inherently political.
There are only two flaws with antagonistic lawyer Michael Avenatti’s argument for indicting President Trump: It has no basis in fact, and it has no basis in law.
Why did President Obama feel the need to stress his commitment to ensuring the Russia investigation was handled ‘by the book’ just a month before he left office?
The Supreme Court’s ability to issue a binding opinion on any subject that no one else could overturn is inconsistent with the checks and balances the Framers crafted.
- New York Times Kavanaugh Reporter Told Source What To SayYear-old texts contained in a Senate Judiciary Committecontinue reading >
- The Russian Spy Who Wasn’t? Defamation Case Accuses U.S., U.K. Intelligence Of Using Michael Flynn For Spygate HoaxSvetlana Lokhova pieced together an apparent coordinatecontinue reading >
- Here’s How Boris Johnson Gets The Brexit Deal The U.K. Really NeedsAlthough British Prime Minister Boris Johnson seems to continue reading >