The National Security Strategy to be released on Monday will emphasize the importance of balancing energy security with economic development and environmental protection.
The questions people should really be asking are why Syria joined the Paris agreement and why it chose to do so now, two years after the agreement was first adopted.
A Stanford professor is suing other scientists for critiquing his work in favor of ‘renewable energy.’ That’s not how science works.
Democrats may have read The New York Times’ analysis of the connection between hurricanes and climate change and realized scientists know very little about it.
The New York Times informed us the connection between climate change and hurricanes wasn’t clear. That’s the kind of skepticism that gets serious people branded ‘deniers.’
While thousands of displaced Texans brave hurricane Harvey and continue to flee from deadly, rising flood waters, members of the media are busy politicizing the disaster.
Joe Nickell should approach Al Gore with the same level of credulity he approaches an alleged haunting or UFO sighting. But it seems that he is a selective skeptic.
A climate scientist at the Department of Interior claims the Trump administration reassigned him for talking about climate change.
Individuals who choose to have fewer kids should by all means proceed. Meanwhile, pro-family conservatives shall inherit the future.
In the vast majority of cases, how many kids you have just won’t affect any environmental outcomes. Plus the study on which these articles were based is junk science.
In his New York Magazine article, ‘The Uninhabitable Earth,’ doomsayer David Wallace-Wells issues numerous dire warnings that aren’t supported by science.
If they can’t reduce the current number of people on earth, climate alarmists can teach young people that reproducing is amongst the worst of moral sins. But they’re wrong.
Abortion advocates such as Cosmopolitan magazine’s Jill Filipovic enthusiastically tweeted an article about reducing population for climate change.
Since Trump’s Rose Garden announcement that the United States would pull out of the Paris climate agreement, world leaders have been whining.
You’d think the 97 percent of scientists who supposedly all agree about climate change would eagerly line up to vanquish climate deniers—but apparently not.
‘How G.O.P. Leaders Came to View Climate Change as Fake Science’ is The New York Times’ latest anthropological study of the strange species known as ‘Republicans.’
The columnist who wrote an entire column in 2011 that derisively compared global warming with religion now believes that humans are responsible for climate change.
Your hysterics surrounding the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris global warming arrangement have finally driven it home for us: this isn’t working.
The man who has satirized corporate culture and groupthink for nearly 30 years is agitating the groupthink on both sides of the climate change debate.
- Can We Be Honest About Women?Here’s a little secret we have to say out loud: Womencontinue reading >
- 8 Worst Defenses Of FBI Agent’s Anti-Trump ‘Insurance Policy’ TextsHow do the media handle dramatic updates that counter tcontinue reading >
- Why Criminalizing Sexual Harassment Fosters Witch HuntsSexual harassment digests a degenerate thug like Harveycontinue reading >