In the culture war, conservatives haven’t given up without a fight so much as they’ve been trampled underfoot.
Embryos are routinely manufactured according to specification — their genetic makeup is literally chosen from a catalogue.
The City of Atlanta will pay its former fire chief Kelvin Cochran $1.2 million for firing him after he wrote a Bible study that expressed the Christian view of marriage as between a man and woman.
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh told senators, ‘The days of discriminating against gay and lesbian Americans or treating [them] as inferior in dignity and worth are over.’
Surrogacy does not serve human relationships. Surrogacy severs human relationships, which damages our shared human future.
Jack Phillips personifies the American dream. Just about the only people who can’t seem to recognize that are government officials employed by the state of Colorado.
Canada’s supreme court presumed to tell Trinity Western University what is and is not integral to the practice of their faith. This is a worrisome development.
Our cultural elites treat opposition to same-sex marriage as beyond the bounds of reasonable discourse. But three years’ more experience only reinforce that it’s a legal and cultural mistake.
The Washington Supreme Court will retake Arlene’s Flowers and likely have to decide whether ‘bouquet’ is in the eye of the beholder, and which beholder’s eye matters more under the law.
During Thursday’s confirmation hearing, Sen. Corey Booker (D-N.J.) raked secretary of state nominee Mike Pompeo over the coals for his beliefs on same-sex marriage.
The Oregon Court of Appeals upheld a $135,000 fine against the owners of a local cake shop who declined to use their artistic skills to create a custom cake for a same-sex wedding.
The Christian small business owners involved in these lawsuits have no desire to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, nor do they ask for the right to do so.
Except for justices Kagan and Ginzburg, an uneasiness about the case was evident to a greater and lesser degree among the other 7 Supreme Court justices.
If I encountered an individual morally uncomfortable with participating in an activity with me and my boyfriend, it would be uncomfortable for me to force her.
Most justices first frame the issue by using judicial discretion of one kind or another to remove from consideration the nature of the product requested for a same-sex wedding.
If one’s exposure to the case was limited to the popular media, you might think this case was only about the free-speech rights of wedding-cake makers. It’s much more.
Those on the Left cheering as anti-discrimination law is turned into a weapon against the First Amendment freedoms should consider whether they really want to weaken these rights.
Since the court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. Smith, free exercise of religion no longer gets the protection that free speech does.
- NYT Reveals FBI Retaliated Against Trump For Comey FiringA Friday expose from the New York Times reveals that thcontinue reading >
- Missing: Key Documents About Alleged Misconduct By Robert Mueller’s Lead ProsecutorLate Friday, a federal judge’s office confirmed that continue reading >
- Think Progress Is Furious That A Woman Defended Herself From Armed Robbery In ChicagoAccording to Zack Ford, a woman must first determine thcontinue reading >