A close look at Amy Coney Barrett’s legal writings indicates deep respect for the precedent set by landmark Supreme Court cases, including Roe v. Wade.
As the Supreme Court vindicates the administration’s approach to abortions for internationally trespassing teens, it’s time to bring this episode to its rightful conclusion.
An ordinance calling for a complete ban on abortion within Lubbock, Texas’s city limits to create a ‘sanctuary city for the unborn’ has gained national attention.
June Medical shows that 47 years after Roe, the court still can’t agree on the standards for state abortion limits. Five justices at the very least aren’t committed to abortion on demand.
It is time to insist on nominees who have made a clear repudiation of Roe v. Wade. The benefits of keeping quiet are not worth the costs.
After nearly 50 years of pro-life efforts, all we’ve gotten is a series of judges who continue to strengthen Roe v. Wade and its unconstitutional, immoral progeny.
‘If you’re not being sued by the ACLU, it’s because you’re already doing exactly what they want you to do — nothing,’ says Rusk City Councilman Martin Holsome.
An extreme Kansas Supreme Court abortion decision prompted pro-lifers to introduce the Value Them Both Amendment, which so-called pro-life Democratic legislators have failed to support.
In 1992, the Supreme Court staked its abortion doctrine on the notion that women require abortion to vie for equal opportunity. That has been proven wrong time and time again.
Should Roe v. Wade be overturned, the question of abortion would return to the states, in most cases the legislative branch.
Can answers to a poll question like ‘Do you support Roe v. Wade?’ demonstrate that the public supports the abortion policy Roe requires? Not at all.
Abortion providers in Texas don’t think the state should require them to kill a fetus before dismembering it in its mother’s womb.
Should pro-lifers who voted for the president because he promised to nominate a judge who would overturn Roe worry it won’t happen?
The real sham against women is the Supreme Court’s false promises of protection. Clearly, shoddy, substandard, and incompetent abortionists provide mere ‘access’ to abortion.
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a dissenting opinion ripping apart the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down Texas laws requiring health standards for abortion.
Planned Parenthood’s research arm is hiding data to bolster claims that Planned Parenthood and IUDs are reducing unintended births among poor women.
You will never believe the horrors Pennsylvanian women endured before lawmakers required abortion facilities to comply with basic medical standards.
The Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act would ban abortions after 20 weeks gestation. And it’s probably consonant with Roe v. Wade.
- GOP Lawmaker Caves On Democrats’ 9/11-Style Commission To Investigate Capitol RiotRepublicans on the House Homeland Security Committee hacontinue reading >
- Ad Seeks To Place ‘A Pair Of Destructive Demon Cats Who Stink Up Your Home’If Prancer, the 'haunted Victorian child' dog from viracontinue reading >
- Would An Actual Potato Be Better At Hosting ‘Reliable Sources’ Than Brian Stelter?If potato head Brian Stelter finds an elementary maskincontinue reading >