Amy Wilentz, an English professor at the University of California, Irvine, details for The New York Times a truthy series of myths about California’s fiery, electric-less travails.
Full of essays presenting slavery as the central issue of the American story, and accusing the free market of creating such bondage, the ‘1619 Project’ is another attempt to make Americans question their country’s very core.
The New York Times and the Washington Post sliced up the transcript of a call between President Trump and the Ukrainian president to fit a false media narrative.
There are three problems with Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly’s claims about correcting a smear against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh in a New York Times article Saturday.
A new Atlantic-published, adapted excerpt of the book attempts to resurrect Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly’s anti-Kavanaugh smears but once again has a major error.
Reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly make more uncorroborated allegations against Kavanaugh on ‘The View’ all while painting themselves as the victims.
New York Times airs a claim from a Democrat attorney, failing to note the alleged victim denies memory of the incident.
Despite the convenient revisionism of leftists like those at The New York Times, there is no evidence that the Tea Party’s popularity was propelled by racism.
The 1619 Project isn’t mostly about helping Americans understand the role of slavery in our history. It’s mostly about convincing Americans that ‘America’ and ‘slavery’ are synonyms.
By reframing America’s founding around slavery, the 1619 Project misreads history and the role Americans played in realizing the ideals of the Declaration.
When The New York Times changed its front-page headline on the president’s Tuesday address, the paper made an important concession.
The unanimous decision greatly increases the odds a jury will hear Sarah Palin’s claim that the Times acted with actual malice by linking her to an assassination attempt on a congresswoman.
The New York Times has announced to the world it thinks it unacceptable to publish a news headline without also signaling the paper’s institutional disapproval of President Trump.
This effort to control language is a deliberate erasure of the identities of those who are happy to identify with our biological sex.
After reading the latest installment in the ‘my husband disappoints me’ genre in The New York Times last weekend — this one penned by a clinical psychologist — I’d say we have a trend.
How can you claim to be a Christian, let alone a Christian minister, while denying one essential element after another of Jesus’ own life and teaching? Either Jesus is a liar or she is.
Perhaps Haberman believes ‘Edelweiss’ in the modern world is a symbol of a fictional television takeover by Nazis. That’s the only explanation I can come up with.
Progressive groups want ‘corporate America to blacklist senior people in the Trump administration.’ By this standard, a long list of American leaders will have to be ‘canceled’ too.
Sen. Ben Sasse’s bill merely requires a medical team to treat a survivor of abortion the same as Jen Gunter’s doctors treated her three premature babies.
The Times is somewhere between misleading by omission and outright lying to their readers about the threats posed by lack of border security.
- Democrats Concede Their Impeachment Argument Is FailingDemocratic leadership has indicated they can't move thecontinue reading >
- Jury Rules Against David Daleiden, Undercover Journalists In Federal Planned Parenthood CaseThe jury in a federal civil trial ruled Daleiden and hicontinue reading >
- Marie Yovanovitch Admits There Was No Crime, No Bribery From Trump On UkraineFormer U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch admcontinue reading >