Vice President Mike Pence’s original and most damning sin is that he’s a Christian who actually believes what Christians actually believe.
In defending a new hire with a history of anti-white statements, The New York Times employs a clear double standard about denigrating racial rhetoric, and it is time for it to explain why.
The Sarah Jeong hiring and Bari Weiss reaction tell you a great deal about where The New York Times and progressivism are and where they’re headed.
In a statement released Thursday, The New York Times defended its most recent hire, Sarah Jeong, saying that the newspaper of record knew about her history of racist tweets and hired her anyway.
The New York Times owes President Trump, Jordan Peterson, and the alt-right an apology for labeling them racists for doing the precise same thing The New York Times did this week.
Yes, the news media hates Donald Trump. No, it isn’t a conspiracy.
All of the major players in this story — Ali Watkins, James Wolfe, The New York Times, and the Department of Justice — behaved in less than admirable fashion.
As with much media coverage of the Trump administration, The New York Times’ extremely negative story elided crucial facts, was based on anonymous sources, and contained false information.
In an opinion article posing as a news story, The New York Times launches an illiberal and wrongheaded attack on free speech. At least we know where they stand.
Feminists like Jessica Valenti are attempting to usurp the true definition of feminism via any means possible and write their own rules in the process.
Articles attempting to debunk the negative experience of abortion continue to be everywhere. Those of us who have experienced the negative consequences find it frustrating and unjust.
There may have been a real White House briefing with real White House officials, but The New York Times couldn’t be trusted to accurately summarize what the White House official said. And it wasn’t on a minor point.
A New York Times Magazine hit piece says more about the mainstream media than it says about Jordan Peterson.
It’s reasonable to assume that much of the new information in the New York Times report relates to leakers’ fears about information that will be coming out in the inspector general report.
Nobody goes around saying we obviously don’t need Homeland Security because there haven’t been terrorist attacks for the last month. So just because moms combat entropy doesn’t make their work meaningless.
The New York Times article is riddled with errors that multiple sources publicly deny. It fails to include information easily found in the public record.
This week, two New York Times writers drew outrage from progressives. Will the paper succumb to criticism, or continue its new commitment to conservative voices?
Kyle Duncan had nothing to do with John Thompson’s criminal case. Duncan also had nothing to do with the prosecutors who withheld evidence from Thompson’s attorneys.
- The Conventional Wisdom About Millennial Suffering Is A MythDespite a sense of unearned victimhood, millennials havcontinue reading >
- Obama-Era State Department Official Provides More Evidence Of FISA AbuseKathleen Kavalec’s notes provide at least four more pcontinue reading >
- In Wake Of Federal Tax Reform, Blue States Scramble To Hide High TaxesDemocrats insist richer people need to pay more taxes. continue reading >