Two House Republicans introduced legislation that would bar federal funds from flowing to schools with curriculum featuring the New York Times’ 1619 Project.
The media should think more carefully about the tenuous logic behind their radically chic worldview.
It is our job to keep this republic. If it fails for lack of effort, we will have ourselves to blame as much as those leftists actively trying to tear it down with the 1619 Project.
The 1619 Project wants to reorient American history around a year of black enslavement and disaster. Serbian politician Slobodan Milošević pursued this strategy in Yugoslavia and sparked a blood-soaked horror.
In many ways, the adoption of the 1619 Project doesn’t essentially change American history for most students. It still relies on the same methods of history instruction.
Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton introduced legislation last week that would ban federal funding from schools teaching the 1619 Project.
Nearly a year since anti-American 1619 Project was unveiled, far too many of its egregious historical falsehoods have been blindly accepted by the media.
This effort to extend the 1619 reeducation program into popular culture is particularly dangerous because stories have the power to change minds through emotion instead of reason.
Hannah-Jones’ words matter. They are the same words that may well emanate from our children’s lips if we do not take our schools back.
Hannah-Jones claimed that the actions of European settlers and explorers such as Christopher Columbus were “acts of devils” and likens them to Hitler.
Pulitzer Prize winner Nikole Hannah-Jones is now peddling ridiculous conspiracy theories.
Hannah-Jones’ ownership of The 1619 Project as inciting this type of defamation with its wrong portrayal of American history is telling of her own motivation for the project.
Three women clearing “Black Lives Matter” graffiti from the Lafayette Building in Washington, D.C. were harassed, called “disgusting.”
Eight days of nationwide anarchy in the midst of a public health pandemic have fully exposed the lunacy of our new obsessively woke era.
New York Times Pulitzer Prize-winning writer Nikole Hannah-Jones attempted to justify terrorizing American cities by saying “property can be replaced.”
You can have all the defenders at The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Atlantic you want. But it really doesn’t matter compared to the influence of the new gatekeepers.
The same Democrats who so desperately want to win back the voters they lost to Donald Trump in 2016 are unwilling to see them as unique and individual voters, continuing ever to view them only as a caricatured group.
Joe Biden still lives in a 20th Century world of rules regarding race, he better change that soon if he wants progressive votes.
Despite the retractions, disparagement from legitimate historians, and ignored fact-checkers, the 1619 Project now boasts the industry’s most respected award.
The 1619 Project’s flagship essay has been awarded a Pulitzer Prize, despite the fact that it underwent a major correction and has been criticized as revisionist history by leading historians.
- If Brian Laundrie Had Done Any Of These 5 Things, He’d Already Be In FBI CustodyWe can hope the FBI succeeds in bringing justice to famcontinue reading >
- Only Nine Months In And The Biden Presidency Has Failed SpectacularlyIt's tough to maintain the illusion that you're the anscontinue reading >
- Hormonal Birth Control Is Killing Women. Why Won’t The FDA Talk About It?Many women are realizing the synthetic hormones in mostcontinue reading >