Historian Mary Grabar’s book, ‘Debunking The 1619 Project,’ provides lots of useful historical context and facts to counter The New York Times’ racial sophistry.
The New York Times’ 1619 Project virtually ignores the Democrat Party’s role in advancing and sustaining racism in the United States.
Are they special? Were they able to accomplish something in spite of being black that others in the same race cannot?
Academics weigh in on New York Times writer Nikole Hannah-Jones receiving tenure at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Some grifter demanding tenure — and receiving it — based entirely on the ideological assertions shared with the Klan, is not some small thing.
The Times glossed over the fact that the paper has issued major corrections to Hannah-Jones’s 1619 Project.
Hannah-Jones was paid a total of $50,000 using resources from a program intended to help kids struggling with school attendance.
The arguments made by conservatives skeptical of critical race theory need to be addressed and met on their actual merits.
Concerns over the 1619 Project and its creator stem not from a desire to ‘cancel’ anyone but to ensure American history education is truthful and accurate.
Murkily defined ‘cancel culture’ is becoming useless as a category because the left and right are increasingly aware some things truly warrant cancelation.
The New York Times’ champion of fake history, Nikole Hannah-Jones, was denied tenure in her new role at the University of North Carolina.
The state of Oregon is paying Nikole Hannah-Jones of The New York Times’s “1619 Project” is set to lecture teachers and students on systemic racism.
Nikole Hannah-Jones will join the UNC-Chapel Hill’s Hussman School of Journalism in Media in July as the Knight Chair in Race and Investigative Journalism.
New York Times “1619 Project” writer Nikole Hannah-Jones earned $25,000 to lecture students at The University Of Oregon on systemic racism and other topics.
The New York Times’ “1619 Project” will receive a major platform as Hulu sheds a spotlight on an ahistorical and flawed report on “systemic racism.”
Nikole Hannah-Jones believes 74 million Americans deserve to be “punished” as part of deprogramming them for voting for Donald Trump in 2020.
The criticism sent the project’s architect into rage, with her predictably calling the fair-minded critiques of her deceptive scholarship racist.
An impressive array of academics signed a letter to the Pulitzer Prize Board calling for it to revoke the prize it ceremoniously awarded to Nikole Hannah-Jones for the New York Times’ 1619 Project.
Both BLM and 1619 will continue to be propelled by fringe leftists and their hapless corporate sponsors, even though they no longer want to be transparent about all their extreme beliefs.
- Can You Spot The Difference Between These Two Insurrection Photos?Despite the media's disparate treatment, the most recencontinue reading >
- After National School Boards Association Waged War On Parents, Pennsylvania Chapter WithdrawsThe Pennsylvania School Boards Association voted unanimcontinue reading >
- Transhumanists Gather In Spain To Plan Global TransformationTransVision 2021 saw technologists push radical visionscontinue reading >