The Right Should Be Relieved SCOTUS Rejected Judicial Activism In Texas v. Pennsylvania
After Texas v. Pennsylvania, conservatives must rediscover their opposition to judicial overreach. A Warren Court of the right is not the solution we need.
‘Republicans Pounce’ On Democrats’ ‘Hypothetical’ Plan To Destroy Judicial Branch
Whatever newsworthy event Democrats have caused is overshadowed by the fact that Republicans are attacking them for it.
Cotton: If John Roberts Wants To Write Laws, He Should Resign And Run For Office
“If the Chief Justice believes his political judgment is so exquisite, I invite him to resign, travel to Iowa, and get elected,” Cotton said.
Wisconsin Supreme Court Battle Pits Grassroots Conservatives Against 2020 ‘Blue Wall’
While his opponent hopes to bring her focus on social justice to the state Supreme Court, Justice Dan Kelly wishes to ‘assiduously patrol the borders between the branches.’
Court-Packing Is Democrats’ Most Dangerous Attack On The Republic
Prior court-packing shows the practice can have disastrous, perhaps unforeseen results, and poses potential threats to our civil liberties.
The Supreme Court Is Not The Final Say On The Constitution
The judiciary’s rulings are not the supreme law of the land, even rulings from the Supreme Court. The judiciary is not the only or even final arbiter on the Constitution.
Why I Won’t Stop Asking Judicial Nominees If They Will Follow The Constitution
All too often, lower courts have used a bad legal doctrine to stop states and local governments from protecting the unborn, even when Supreme Court case law would allow it.
How Overturning Roe Could Expand Abortion Inside The United States
In the event Roe gets overturned, it won’t be the win for abortion abolition that pro-lifers claim. We must strategize accordingly.
John Roberts Is Wrong. America’s Courts Are Obviously Politicized
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts’ attempt to defend the independence of the judiciary, in light of President Trump’s comments that courts are politicized, did more harm than good.
Confirming Kavanaugh Will Not Fix The Problem Of Judicial Supremacy
Even if Brett Kavanaugh turns out to be a tremendous originalist justice, the courts still represent a major threat to the republic.
Why It’s Ludicrous For Chuck Schumer To Claim Brett Kavanaugh Threatens Government Health Care
The idea that the Supreme Court might strike down Obamacare, and that a Justice Kavanaugh would cast the deciding vote to do so, ranges from implausible to ridiculous.
Tomi Lahren’s Position On Roe v. Wade Makes Absolutely No Sense
It’s not especially her political apostasy that’s the problem. It’s weakness of her arguments.
How Potential SCOTUS Pick Brett Kavanaugh Wrote A Roadmap For Saving Obamacare
Which is worse: An unelected judge opining on how a mandate to purchase a product could meet constitutional muster, or giving Congress instructions on how to ensure it will? Kavanaugh did both.
Republicans Shouldn’t Ask Judges To Strike Obamacare When Congress Won’t
Striking down the law through legal fiat would represent judicial activism at its worst—asking unelected judges to do what elected members of Congress took great pains to avoid.
Left Finally Admits They Pack Courts With Politicized Judges, And Plan To Amp It Up
The proposal is simple: when Democrats next hold the presidency and Senate, they should pack the courts to ensure that the Left can achieve its goals.
Oregon Court Holds Bakers Responsible For How People Feel About What They Say
The Oregon Court of Appeals upheld a $135,000 fine against the owners of a local cake shop who declined to use their artistic skills to create a custom cake for a same-sex wedding.
Federal Judges Set A Dangerous Precedent By Blocking Trump’s Military Orders
Judges—who typically lack military service and work in courtrooms far removed from its realities—are ill-positioned and ill-qualified to evaluate judgment calls by military leaders.
The Left’s Contempt For The Law Is Destroying Public Trust
For too many Americans, the American legal system is no longer simply the arbiter of what the law means and how it applies to a given set of facts.