A growing number of Democrats tolerate, or even gladly support, the movement to boycott Israel. They justify it in the name of free speech and social justice, but it’s economic warfare.
Linda Sarsour now alleges the existence of Jews and their grandchildren in their historic homeland is akin to white supremacy.
The establishment press must be getting quite a crick in its collective neck from having to look away so often from the antisemitic elements of the left, including within the Democratic Party.
After being granted access to Israel, Rashida Tlaib released a statement saying she would no longer visit Israel because of “oppressive conditions.”
Several speakers reminded the overwhelmingly Christian audience (with a smattering of observant Jews) that anti-Semitism is a cancer, and it’s everybody’s problem.
The congresswoman claims her Holocaust remarks were taken ‘out of context.’ But the proper context shows she’s pushing a terrorist narrative about Israel.
Several student groups have denounced Hill’s praise for Jewish and Western civilization’s achievements as “racist, anti-Palestinian, xenophobic, sexist and Islamophobic,” characterizing his criticisms of Sharia law as “barbaric.”
In another year, finding 21 Democrats willing to support pro-Israel legislation should have been a cakewalk. However, 2019 is not any old year.
Israel has the moral right to annex all of the West Bank, for a plethora of reasons. Israel’s right to exist is non-negotiable and it has a right to unilaterally apply Israeli law over its nation-state.
Many young progressives view the crisis from the lens that Palestinians are being persecuted while battling an Israeli oppressor that has no right to exist.
The new wave of freshman Democrats is beginning to criticize our nation’s historically strong ties with Israel. The party is clearly splitting on this issue of historic bipartisan unity.
The Palestinian government could choose to take care of its own people and has the money to do it, but instead chooses to fund terror.
If the group had waited a few days to visit the Muslim Quarter until their Birthright trip had ended, they couldn’t make a scene and grandstand for 147,000 viewers.
Looking at the formation of the state of Israel through the lens of the Holocaust isn’t really the right way to understand it. Instead, what really matters is the postwar history.
Hamas wants to provoke casualties. It wants to become the victim. Sadly for the Palestinian people and the Jews, it gets plenty of help from the media.
Hamas traffics in the death of civilians, preferably women and children, sometimes real, sometimes staged, always to pull the heart strings of Westerners.
The Palestinian-Israeli conflict is at its core a clash of unbridgeable historical narratives, not just a dispute over land, territory, and security.
The new strategy represents a substantive challenge to the foreign policy establishment that has reigned in DC for decades.
- Why Criminal Prosecution Might Be The Least Of Ilhan Omar’s Legal ConcernsRep. Ilhan Omar needs competent immigration counsel to continue reading >
- In Royal Showdown, Queen Elizabeth Bests Meghan MarkleHarry is alleged to have yelled at staff, ‘What Meghacontinue reading >
- How A Feminist Juror’s Lies Could Get Harvey Weinstein’s Conviction Tossed OutIt doesn’t take a rocket scientist to deduce that a pcontinue reading >