Let’s be real about gerrymandering: both parties use it, it’s the proper political process, and its detractors are mostly hypocrites.
The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 vote Thursday that political gerrymandering is a power delegated to Congress, not the judiciary.
The Constitution demands we solve it at the ballot box, or in our state and federal legislatures. We should stop expecting the Supreme Court to step up.
Redistricting for the ‘efficiency gap’ further abandons the idea that voters should have a real choice, and that their representative is out to represent them, not their political party.
Joy Behar said Democrats lost key senate races because of gerrymandering in a segment on ABC’s ‘The View’ Wednesday morning.
Some 600,000 Californians have signed a petition that would allow a vote on whether to split the state into three.
SCOTUS reporter Kevin Daley joins the Federalist Radio Hour to talk all the latest court and justice stories including #FreeAdnan, the NIFLA case, and more.
What is more in accord with the rule of law: four justices usurping the power of a co-equal branch of government, or a legislature doing exactly what the state constitution allows?
The teens going on television to agitate for gun control after the Parkland shooting make the case, not for lowering the voting age, but for raising it.
The court’s decision, which incredibly did not cite case law or a constitutional provision, was a show of legislative force.
Perhaps Thomas Brunell is unfit to run the U.S. Census Bureau. But his thesis on competitive elections is perfectly reasonable.
Gerrymandering is a self-defeating enterprise, in which the rigged system always unrigs itself.
The biggest current winners of a practice nearly as old as the republic are black and Hispanic members of Congress. Do Democrats want to reduce their numbers?
A look at history will show how the Supreme Court’s liberal justices abandoned their principles in pursuit of a purely political win for Democrats.
- New York Times Reporters Also Omitted Key Kavanaugh Detail In NPR InterviewIt's not that the reporters mentioned the most importancontinue reading >
- New Book: Christine Blasey Ford’s Friend Leland Keyser Doesn’t Believe Her"It just didn't make any sense," lifelong friend Lelandcontinue reading >
- Witnesses Defended Kavanaugh. NYT Authors Falsely Claimed They Were SilentA new Atlantic-published, adapted excerpt of the book acontinue reading >