Tinslee Lewis is just the latest victim of politicians who believe the state has more interest than families in determining who should receive care.
Why, now that doctors can do so much with advancements in modern medicine, are they turning their backs on the patients who need them most, and saying it’s for their own good?
The media has for decades been constructing a pretense that an elderly four-time cancer patient who falls asleep on the job and can barely walk is peppy, alert, and capable.
Note to American patients: If you want the best health care money could buy as of 1973—the year when Medicare began coverage of end-stage renal disease—then you’ll love single-payer health care.
Prices are too high and choices are too few, and the federal government’s response has long been more government control and more money.
Despite existing Medicaid’s looming financial failure, leftists are clamoring that a single-payer system—or’ Medicare for All’—be imposed on the entire country.
A new rule from HHS would allow doctors, nurses, and hospitals to opt out of medical services such as abortion that conflict with their religious beliefs.
Providers should not be allowed to profit from gaming the health care system by intentionally keeping their network status and prices a secret.
In times of crisis, like with the measles outbreak in Washington, we should think about ways to increase vaccine accessibility and knowledge.
Pro-life doctors can’t sit idly by anymore. They cannot allow hostile lawmakers to adjudicate their consciences for them with stakes this high.
Given the undeniable medical and psychological risks of administering opposite-sex hormones, the physicians question how any child, adolescent, or parent can give truly informed consent.
The NRA has every right to call out groups that use science to conceal their political arguments.
The past decade of throwing taxpayers’ money at health information technology makes the Solyndra boondoggle look like chump change.
Over the past 50 years, health policy has failed disastrously, making conditions worse only after spending billions of taxpayer dollars without adding anything to patient care.
For this healthy couple over 60 years old, there is no substantive difference between Obamacare and the AHCA. In many respects, we may be worse off financially.
Direct primary care offers in reality what our political class has thus far offered us only in theory: sane, reasonable, and affordable health care.
- Mickey Guyton Represents The Left’s Next Cultural Conquest: Country MusicMickey Guyton is every self-conscious, self-loathing Nacontinue reading >
- In Philadelphia Foster Care Case, Roberts Supreme Court Refuses To Protect Christians From PersecutionThe Philadelphia foster care case represented yet anothcontinue reading >
- NBC ‘Journalist’ Furious That Critical Race Theory Critics Are Doing Better Journalism Than She isShould we be shocked that a so-called journalist is cricontinue reading >