A federal right to education would lead to a national, one-size-fits-none educational system, under which states would be powerless to object. It’s an unconstitutional disaster.
The sweeping language of the Equal Rights Amendment provides a practically endless number of potential legal hooks for gender-bending social engineering from the bench.
This week, House Democrats will reportedly pass a measure to lift the 1982 deadline on a feminist amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would actually hurt women and identity politics groups.
For 187 years, the United States had only one president face impeachment. Since 1974, three have. This is a disturbing and dangerous trajectory.
If a legislature ratifies a constitutional amendment, but that amendment does not exist, has the legislature actually done anything?
Roe was wrong on the day it was written, but to settle the issue we must go beyond overturning it. The people must demand that the Constitution be amended to prevent rulings like Roe from happening again.
Creating a sex-neutral society would erase the benefits women receive while majorly expanding government power. All to appease the faux-feminist left.
Twenty-four state legislatures that ratified the Equal Rights Amendment included the seven-year limit when they voted to add the ERA to the Constitution. How are 41- to 46-year-old state ‘ratifications’ valid today?
The feminist ideas animating a push for an ‘equal rights’ amendment to the Constitution pose a serious threat to our liberties.
In a time when the Left has already reached second base with socialism, a basic understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment and what it stands for can be a powerful tool to combat that threat.
To restore the Constitution requires specific, concrete action to overturn the specific, concrete actions and decisions by past presidents, Congresses, and Supreme Courts.
We should welcome renewed attention to our Constitution post-Election Day. Just because it has lasted this long doesn’t mean it’s safe.
The current problems in American governance may not stem from too much populism, but too little.
Sen. Mark Udall’s constitutional amendment is nothing short of an attempt to prevent Americans from speaking about their political views.
- Demi Lovato Calls Gender Reveal Parties ‘Transphobic’Demi Lovato finds pink and blue offensive, saying she bcontinue reading >
- The Capitol Police Chief And Her Democratic Bosses Are Lying To You All To Hold Our Capital HostagePanic porn and agitprop are useful tools when you're wocontinue reading >
- DC Will Remain Under Military Occupation As Long As Pelosi RulesThe contrast of security at the U.S. Capitol and the socontinue reading >