The attorney who argued this case says the decision ‘reassures us all that, no matter what you believe, the law can’t force you to express a message in conflict with your deepest convictions.’
A recent controversy over cultural insensitivity at the Whitney Museum in New York betrays the Left’s basic incapacity to process conflict and confusion over the rule of law.
The furor over Trump’s executive order on immigration isn’t about the Constitution. It’s about liberals’ contempt for Trump.
The real problem is that it’s standard operating procedure for an unelected commission of bureaucrats to investigate complaints about what some guy says on air.
President Donald Trump’s campaign tried to air this ad touting his first 100 days in office. The media refused to air it. See the ad for yourself.
On Wednesday, several members of Congress introduced a resolution that would end free speech zones and reaffirm the First Amendment on campuses.
The press release for a new poll makes the welcome claim that ‘Vast, Silent Majority of Millennials Overwhelmingly Support Religious and Social Freedoms.’ Alas, the results are more complicated.
Since free expression at American universities has been stomped on so regularly, the real free expression warriors should be obvious. Instead, Newseum selected an odd collection.
Trinity Lutheran Church is only asking to be treated the same as everyone else. That shouldn’t be too much to ask.
Progressive college students seem to think violence is okay as long as it’s silencing ‘hate speech.’ Someone should tell them there’s no such thing.
ADF Legal Counsel, Kerri Kupec, joins this episode of Federalist Radio to break down some of the most important current First Amendment legal cases.
Telling Christians, like Barronelle Stutzman, to affirm or participate in same-sex marriages effectively tells them to contradict what they believe to be foundational truths about the world.
If ‘each and every individual’ has the right to artistic self-determination, why is the ACLU spearheading efforts to destroy people who exercise those rights?
The student-run judicial court decided that failing to disclose the cost of free glow sticks was so serious a violation that they handed the win to the man who had lost.
If the Wyoming Supreme Court is permitted to insert an unstated requirement upon judges, what prevents some future court from reading pastors, priests, and bishops into the same decision?
In nonprofit advocacy, disclosure often enables harassment and intimidation for those whose stances clash with nation’s cultural elite.
A long list of professors have agreed to challenge their classrooms, and this will make a difference within the lecture halls, but that’s not enough.
Cosmopolitan’s Jill Filipovic has constructed an argument against originalism that should embarrass even the most disinterested of history students.
The 3-2 decision of the Wyoming Supreme Court says holding mainstream Christian beliefs undermines Judge Ruth Neely’s impartiality even though marriages aren’t part of her duties.
- To Avoid Impeachment, Trump Should PivotWhat does a Trump pivot look like? It looks like runnincontinue reading >
- ‘Alien: Covenant’ Shows How Being Nice Can Be SuicidalHad the crew in ‘Alien: Covenant’ included a couplecontinue reading >
- We Are Watching A Slow-Motion Coup D’etatThis coup d’etat is not only about President Trump. Icontinue reading >