While we hoped freer trade with the West would lead China toward liberal democracy, the result has been an increasingly oppressive government.
The popular narrative goes that because President Trump launched a trade war against China, China has retaliated by tariffing agriculture products from red states that voted for Trump. False.
The ongoing economic brinkmanship between China and the United States is hurting all parties involved, yet no one is happy with the status quo.
What China did this week is the strongest counteraction it has taken so far in its ongoing trade war. It might have achieved the desired effect of causing market panic, but it will end up hurting China the most.
Don’t listen to the left scream that tax cuts caused a slowdown, and don’t listen to the supply siders who say tax cuts would be working great, were it not for tariffs.
The trade war between China and the United States isn’t a conflict that will remain confined to the economy. It’s a risky play in a new Cold War.
Calvin Coolidge was not quite the laissez-faire president he’s been made out to be, nor was he a servant of Big Business. The truth is somewhere in between.
Chinese President Xi came to the summit with serious economic and political challenges domestically. President Trump was in a stronger negotiation position. So what happened?
Tariffs can serve non-economic purposes. Although economically harmful, they can sometimes be used to gain political advantages that outweigh their economic costs.
Why the much-hyped deal between the United States and Mexico to avoid tariffs and crack down on Central American migrants is mostly window-dressing.
Beijing has major risks to bear, too, if the trade squabble drags on for too long. Here’s why it would be in Xi’s best interest to reconcile with Trump.
Ben Domenech and Riley Walters discuss the U.S. relationship with China as both an economic and national security threat.
China may well have been willing to give foreign companies wider access to its markets, but not to the extent of having those concessions codified into law.
We understand it would be wrong to let politicians interfere with our freedom to trade with our local grocery store. The same argument applies when looking at international trade.
China may be able to absorb the latest round of tariffs by turning goods destined for export around for internal consumption.
Free trade supporters will be disappointed in clauses such as the minimum wage requirement and recognition of bargaining rights. But such clauses appeal to union voters, who like Trump.
Many of the items set to be taxed are craft supplies — like yarn and fleece — that are purchased from China and sold in U.S. stores.
In the small border city of Laredo, Texas, the entire world shows up every day, determined to get into the United States.
- Censure Vote Against Kyrsten Sinema Is Why We Can’t Have Nice ThingsDemocrats' very public reprimand of Sinema is not aboutcontinue reading >
- The Entire News Media Is Biased. They Should Just Embrace ItLet’s dispense with the fiction that the media is objcontinue reading >
- Another Day, Another Shooting. Boring!You didn’t read about it? Probably not. That’s becacontinue reading >