HHS proposed a new rule that would remove ‘gender identity’ and ‘termination of pregnancy’ from the 2016 rule’s definition of ‘on the basis of sex.’
CNN legal analyst Joan Biskupic’s biography of Chief Justice John Roberts, ‘The Chief,’ is so preoccupied with disagreeing with the man that it doesn’t provide much insight into Roberts’s life and rulings.
If a federal court strikes down the health-care law, the bill would re-codify virtually all of Obamacare’s major insurance regulations on the state level in Louisiana.
If congressmen need to hire an accountant to do their taxes, maybe Robert Francis O’Rourke should think about coming up with a simpler tax code?
To put it bluntly, Nancy Pelosi put partisan allegiances—to Obama, and against Trump—ahead of her oath of office to uphold the Constitution.
The study proves how claims that Republican legislation would kill tens of thousands of individuals annually had little bearing in reality.
History raises questions about whether liberals’ outrage over President Trump’s emergency declaration stems from his extralegal actions—or their opposition to his border policies.
Instead of promoting better policies, House Republican leaders would like to cave to socialized medicine in the most efficient manner possible.
‘Free’ health care comes with significant costs, and policymakers in Florida have opportunities to make those costs apparent to voters.
Maybe ‘Obamacare’ should be renamed ‘Robertscare’ for the justice who went out of his way to save the individual mandate.
Researchers have raised legitimate questions about whether an Obamacare change actually increased death levels nationwide. Will we see chants of ‘Obama lied, people died’?
We’re a long way from the days of Barack Obama’s favorite health care talking point, ‘If you like your plan, you can keep it.’
Absent additional action, Washington DC residents may face sizable tax penalties due to a website mess caused entirely by District officials.
Why did people ‘wind up with their premiums doubled and their coverage cut in half?’ Because of the pre-existing condition provisions in Obamacare.
If the plan, which would hike federal spending $100-120 billion over the next decade, overcomes a ‘furious’ internal debate, it may face an even tougher reception outside the White House.
Obamacare is probably the worst piece of legislation in American history, but this judge’s decision was based on a weak legal argument and will almost certainly be overturned.
Obamacare was sold to the American people under false pretenses and upheld by a dishonest Supreme Court ruling. Now it’s coming apart, and it’s about time.
We don’t need to adopt socialist ‘health care is a human right’ talking points in order to have a better, more efficient, free market system.
Liberals who claim to support Obamacare’s pre-existing condition ‘protections’ don’t want to pay those higher premiums themselves. Imagine that.
- 3 Times Media Falsely Claimed Russiagate Transparency Would End The RepublicAs the media carry water for sources who selectively recontinue reading >
- HBO’s ‘Chernobyl’ Drives Home The Deadly Perils Of StatismHBO’s excellent new miniseries is a harrowing look atcontinue reading >
- New York Times Admits Obama Admin Deployed Multiple Spies Against Trump Campaign In 2016The New York Times admitted on Thursday that the Obama continue reading >