This week, two New York Times writers drew outrage from progressives. Will the paper succumb to criticism, or continue its new commitment to conservative voices?
When a member of the most brutal regime on earth is treated like the belle of the Olympic ball, the media needs to stop worrying about normalizing Trump.
Kyle Duncan had nothing to do with John Thompson’s criminal case. Duncan also had nothing to do with the prosecutors who withheld evidence from Thompson’s attorneys.
The media may think it’s okay to disparage attempts to hold the FBI accountable because all rules are off during the Trump era, but they are wrong.
I get frustrated with how poorly news media often cover the internal lives of religious believers and how distorted faith often becomes in news stories.
The New York Times has a responsibility to exercise greater discretion, rather than publish racially charged clickbait like an article arguing white supremacists have an Asian woman fetish.
The New York Times obituary was taken as an opportunity to demonize a leader who has spent his life and influence trying to better the world through charity and the word of God.
If international norms should tell, the United States should join the rest of the developed world and agree to reject this cruel and pointless practice. Right?
It has become a terrible crime to ‘normalize’ Donald Trump. But have we considered the even more terrifying possibility that Donald Trump is normal?
Today, The New York Times editorial board took over the paper’s opinion Twitter account and became a proxy for the Democratic Party.
I don’t know if you’re aware of this, but the Nazis are back right now. They’re at Costco. They’re at Walmart. Not so much at Trader Joe’s, but that could happen, too.
This year, the entirety of the evidence for this New York Times article appears to be — and I’m completely serious — a single tweet by someone with 16 followers as of press time.
Those of us of every race and political perspective must stop looking at everything written about race as an opportunity to call the other side the real racists.
If it was so well known, why did no one stop him? Complicity with Harvey Weinstein’s attacks is built into the entertainment industry.
Journalists can’t push a Russia collusion narrative for a year then go silent because it turns out Russians paid a shady opposition research firm that happens to employ a bunch of their close friends.
The New York Times attempts to exculpate the senators who grilled Seventh Circuit juicial nominee Amy Coney Barrett by blaming Barrett for their questions.
It’s important to push back against Hillary Clinton fans who try to delegitimize the 2016 election by making ludicrous comparisons.
- Dana Loesch: Here’s The Real Story Of What Happened At CNN’s Garbage Town HallAs Loesch and her security detail walked toward the stacontinue reading >
- 6 Reasons Your Right-Wing Friend Isn’t Coming To Your Side On Gun ControlThere are several reasons Second Amendment advocates arcontinue reading >
- Parkland Officer’s Hesitation To Stop Shooting Fits A Pattern Of Police CowardiceIt’s a lot easier to police good people than bad onescontinue reading >