Why did Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders meet with a legal advocacy group founded by a convicted terrorist and that functions as a de facto ‘martyrs fund’ for American jihadists?
The departures of Linda Sarsour, Tamika Mallory, and Bob Bland are much better explained by the ‘infighting and financial mismanagement’ than antisemitism.
Rep. Omar attempted to address her history of controversial comments, but the congresswoman’s responses did little to mitigate concerns her critics have raised.
The fact that Abbas Barzegar conducts research for CAIR while praising those who materially support jihadists is a troubling phenomenon, but points to a larger problem within the field of NGOs.
The Trump administration’s proposed designation of Muslim Brotherhood as a terror organization is a recalibration of American foreign policy that was a long time coming.
Omar’s penchant for provoking millions of Americans with odious words has masked the related elements of her associations, ideology, and background.
Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar gave a speech to CAIR that suggested the real victims of 9/11 were not the 2,977 people who died, along with their families.
Now about 60 organizations have either sued or are considered suing the Southern Poverty Law Center for its fraudulent smears. It’s about time.
Given its extensive history of terrorist support, it might seem odd that many companies and others targeted by the Council on American-Islamic Relations are quick to capitulate to their pressure campaigns.
Democrats have a narrative to maintain, a powerful elected office to retain, and a deeply-flawed but nationally known candidate in Keith Ellison. Bring on the baseless smears against his opponent Doug Wardlow.
The Trump administration ought not to concede one inch to those who wish to sideline the personnel and stifle the policies that would make its counterjihadist agenda a reality.
‘Muslims cannot reform their interpretations of Islam under the boots of regimes that manifest interpretations of Islam through blasphemy, apostasy, and treason laws.’
What unites these two seemingly antithetical movements is their shared desires to accumulate power and topple a common enemy.
The analogue is so close that, reading public statements from the early 1970s and replacing ‘Italian’ with ‘Muslim,’ you’d be hard-pressed to spot the incongruence.
The freakouts when people raise valid questions over Islamist actions are meant to frighten people into silence so Islamists can continue their attacks.
CAIR’s end goal is Muslim communities alienated from law enforcement and the wider American society, totally reliant on Islamist groups like CAIR for representation.
Al Qaeda is “on the run.” ISIS is “contained.” The unraveling of Barack Obama’s national security policy has turned the 44th president into Baghdad Bob.
Blowing up these nonevents is a way to create the perception that discrimination against Muslims is a pervasive problem in American life. It’s not.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations should have no moral authority to discuss Islam in America until it renounces its terrorist ties.
- IG Report Confirms Schiff FISA Memo Media Praised Was Riddled With LiesNearly two years later, the inspector general's report continue reading >
- How Joe Biden Gets Away With Calling A Voter A Fat, Dumb, LiarTrump insults a lot of people, and D.C. elites are horrcontinue reading >
- Why Trump’s Gains With Black Voters Could Swing The 2020 ElectionHow much support can Trump actually gain in 2020? It’continue reading >