‘It severely undermines the confidence in our gun laws as well as the ATF … if there are not criminal consequences,’ Sen. Tom Cotton said.
‘These bills would have not stopped a single mass shooting — not Newtown, not Charleston, not Parkland, not Las Vegas, not Sutherland Springs.’
Congressional Democrats are eager to open the gun control floodgates no matter how unconstitutional or ineffective their ‘solutions’ may be.
Democrats have dusted-off their last attempt and are making another significant push to enact major gun control legislation.
Americans are investing their hard-earned dollars to buy the firearms they want before gun-grabbing politicians attempt to regulate away their rights.
There are no two ways about it. As long as there is a background check system for gun purchases, Democrats will try to transform it into a firearm registry they can use to confiscate guns.
All top 10 Democrat presidential candidates advocate banning the most popular rifles and ammunition magazines in America. Five don’t want to wait for their current owners to die.
It’s not only to prevent a Democrat landslide in 2020. It’s because Democrats will settle for nothing less than gun confiscation.
The media should stop using phrases like ‘mandatory gun buybacks.’ What Democrats propose is the first-ever national confiscation of guns.
Gun rights defenders are willing to genuinely compromise. But gun control advocates do not negotiate in good faith, creating bad policy with no logical end.
Those who demand we #dosomething have no plan to protect innocent men, women, and children from mass shootings. They have a hashtag to placate voters.
These military officers claim the moral high ground in the gun debate. Their service is admirable, but they hardly speak for all of us.
House Democrats are set to pass a bill requiring so-called ‘universal background checks’ at the federal level, which would effectively outlaw private sales throughout the country.
The shooter was able to carry out an act of violence not because of a lack of gun laws, but because of a bureaucratic failure to enforce the existing ones.
Dana Loesch joins Ben Domenech on The Federalist Radio Hour to discuss gun control, the second amendment and how she would protect America’s schoolchildren.
The Supreme Court has been gun-shy for the past few years, but Silvester v. Becerra may finally help move the courts toward competent Second Amendment decisions.
Unlike proposals from the Left that would not have prevented recent shootings, each of these reforms would actually make a meaningful difference.
I started off this process thinking, as do many of my political coreligionists, that reducing gun violence is simply a matter of will, and of overcoming the National Rifle Association.
Had gun controllers’ proposed rules been in place, they would not have prevented America’s recent high-profile mass shootings.
Apparently Democrats would rather have no gun sales ban than a sales ban that allows Americans due-process rights.
- In Exclusive Interview, Trump Calls Sept. 18 Rally A ‘Setup,’ Says GOP Senate Should Fire ‘Disaster’ McConnellTrump called Mitch McConnell a 'disaster,' said George continue reading >
- The 3 Most Important Things To Corporate Media Don’t Matter At All (And That’s The Point)Good government is hard. It’s often boring and unrewacontinue reading >
- My Husband’s A Vaccinated Doctor. Here’s Why I’m Not Getting A COVID ShotIt's quite clear major health institutions might not hacontinue reading >