Intending to paint Jeff Sessions negatively, the Times accidentally paints a diligent and effective agency head who is achieving results over the objections of a large, entrenched, and politically extreme bureaucracy.
Inadequate—and blameworthy—are expressions of sympathy for the abused that disguise the elephant in the rectory. The first responsibility is to call things by their right name.
There are only two flaws with antagonistic lawyer Michael Avenatti’s argument for indicting President Trump: It has no basis in fact, and it has no basis in law.
No other group—not Hispanics, Muslims, or anyone else—have faced what black Americans have. Race in America is not about people of color. It’s about black people.
We’re all breathing emotionally polluted air, and that exposure may not be healthy, especially for children. Let them be kids while they still can.
To understand where Sarah Jeong came from, look to the tax-funded activist departments within Western universities, which teach what Jeong preaches.
Vice President Mike Pence’s original and most damning sin is that he’s a Christian who actually believes what Christians actually believe.
In defending a new hire with a history of anti-white statements, The New York Times employs a clear double standard about denigrating racial rhetoric, and it is time for it to explain why.
The Sarah Jeong hiring and Bari Weiss reaction tell you a great deal about where The New York Times and progressivism are and where they’re headed.
In a statement released Thursday, The New York Times defended its most recent hire, Sarah Jeong, saying that the newspaper of record knew about her history of racist tweets and hired her anyway.
The New York Times owes President Trump, Jordan Peterson, and the alt-right an apology for labeling them racists for doing the precise same thing The New York Times did this week.
Yes, the news media hates Donald Trump. No, it isn’t a conspiracy.
All of the major players in this story — Ali Watkins, James Wolfe, The New York Times, and the Department of Justice — behaved in less than admirable fashion.
As with much media coverage of the Trump administration, The New York Times’ extremely negative story elided crucial facts, was based on anonymous sources, and contained false information.
In an opinion article posing as a news story, The New York Times launches an illiberal and wrongheaded attack on free speech. At least we know where they stand.
Feminists like Jessica Valenti are attempting to usurp the true definition of feminism via any means possible and write their own rules in the process.
Articles attempting to debunk the negative experience of abortion continue to be everywhere. Those of us who have experienced the negative consequences find it frustrating and unjust.
There may have been a real White House briefing with real White House officials, but The New York Times couldn’t be trusted to accurately summarize what the White House official said. And it wasn’t on a minor point.
- School Punishes Male Teacher For Refusing To Watch A Naked Girl In The Boys’ Locker RoomA Florida school district allowed a self-described trancontinue reading >
- How Misguided Environmentalism Is To Blame For California’s WildfiresThe saddest part about these fires in California is thacontinue reading >
- What We Know So Far About Michael Avenatti’s Arrest For Domestic ViolenceOn Wednesday, self-proclaimed ‘Fighter for Good’ Micontinue reading >