It would be both smart politics and good governance to update the list of SCOTUS contenders. When a vacancy emerges, whether before or after the election, who will be considered?
From the internet fever swamps of the left-wing commentariat, plans have emerged to remove Brett Kavanaugh from the Supreme Court by any means necessary.
The largest abortion provider in the United States demonstrated once again its utter disregard for women’s health and safety, and Mayra Rodriguez did something about it.
It wouldn’t take increased police presence or extra force. Sicily did something right when it empowered witnesses to enforce the law, and it could work in Baltimore too.
Ginsburg’s advice against such schemes was sound, but her liberal fans will stop at nothing should they get the chance to change the Supreme Court.
The legal process, which fails to recognize embryos as developing human beings with distinct DNA, has not caught up with modern science.
The job of the courts is not to re-invent the meaning of words to produce a result people want, or to decide the outcome of heated debates.
They may not love him, but GOP activists should be throwing roses at Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell every day of the week.
The Constitution demands we solve it at the ballot box, or in our state and federal legislatures. We should stop expecting the Supreme Court to step up.
Prior court-packing shows the practice can have disastrous, perhaps unforeseen results, and poses potential threats to our civil liberties.
The judiciary’s rulings are not the supreme law of the land, even rulings from the Supreme Court. The judiciary is not the only or even final arbiter on the Constitution.
The pro-life movement seems to have no answer to courts allowing blue states to expand abortion and preventing red states from limiting it even in the smallest ways.
All too often, lower courts have used a bad legal doctrine to stop states and local governments from protecting the unborn, even when Supreme Court case law would allow it.
So long as universal injunctions exist, plaintiffs will be able to impose their policy preferences on the entire country, if they find a willing judge.
Patrick Bumatay would be a highly qualified jurist and a strong conservative voice on the Ninth Circuit Court of appeals. We would be lucky to have him.
Late Friday, a federal judge’s office confirmed that several documents that would shed light on the special counsel’s lead prosecutor’s alleged misconduct are missing from the court record.
Democrats embrace the basic tenet that judging is simply another form of politics. This embrace echoes the rise of the politicized life on the left.
Even if Brett Kavanaugh turns out to be a tremendous originalist justice, the courts still represent a major threat to the republic.
Brett Kavanaugh takes his seat amid debates about the Supreme Court’s ‘legitimacy,’ with substantial portions of the population thinking he’s a rapist.
The whole reason the nation has been subjected to the traumatic Brett Kavanaugh confirmation is because liberals know the Supreme Court is inherently political.
- Let’s Stop Pretending Every Impeachment Witness Is A Selfless HeroIt’s become clear that some witnesses in the impeachmcontinue reading >
- Vindman Just Admitted To Leaking To The Anti-Trump WhistleblowerWhen pressed on who Vindman spoke with about the call, continue reading >
- Vindman Exaggerated His Resume In Prepared Congressional StatementVindman claimed to be the “principal advisor to the Ncontinue reading >