Texas’s new abortion bill will overrun courts with amateur prosecutors avenging wrongs that have not caused them any particularized harm.
The Virginia Supreme Court affirmed a lower court’s decision on Monday to reinstate Loudoun County Public Schools teacher Tanner Cross.
If the biases of contemporary institutions render them incapable of making objective judgments, then the biases of critical race theorists do the same.
In addition to censorship, interpretations of Section 230 have allowed Big Tech to escape accountability for enabling horrendous trafficking.
The decision protects unborn babies with Down syndrome, and tees up a potential SCOTUS challenge of Roe v. Wade.
The losing side needed to know that a fair shake was given, and that justice prevailed, even if it wasn’t the outcome they wanted. That did not happen after Nov. 3.
There is an unmistakable dissonance between Joe Biden’s calls for national unity and his party’s judicial obstructionism over the past four years.
As widespread claims of voter fraud begin to have their day in court, a closer look at the Trump lawsuit in Pennsylvania reveals that numerous claims of voter fraud aren’t really the core claims of the case.
Big Tech is at it again, this time with Twitter censoring The Federalist’s co-founder Sean Davis. His offense? Quoting an official Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision.
As a conservative, an originalist, and a black American, I am greatly intrigued by Sen. Edward Markey’s claim that applying the Constitution as it’s written is racist.
Democrats don’t have to publicly commit to a party goal of packing the Supreme Court. They’ve got a rich network of activist groups working hard on the issue behind closed doors.
Barrett’s authored opinions give no reason to believe she automatically accepts or rejects a government agency’s interpretation of the law.
Democrats’ latest ploy to halt Barrett’s confirmation includes alleging that the hearings cannot move forward because two senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee have contracted the coronavirus.
Such a move would cement Trump’s biggest success: picking committed and youthful originalists—judges who will interpret the Constitution according to its original public meaning
The attacks on Barrett fail to identify the ‘abortion restrictions’ at issue and purposely so, to create the impression she is an extremist.
Nothing better captures the Republican disaster of Supreme Court nominations than George H.W. Bush selecting David Souter, who evolved from mild conservative to left-wing leader.
Trump vowed to choose a nominee from the 2016 list, so he should nominate Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court.
The next president will likely solidify a lasting majority on the courts of appeals, either cementing President Trump’s judicial legacy or largely undoing it.
Judges who can find no support in law for the outcome they want resort to their own personal sense of morality to achieve their desired result.
For nearly four hours Tuesday, the full D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals drilled attorneys for Michael Flynn, the DOJ, and Judge Emmet Sullivan on a wide range of issues, including separation of powers and the propriety of mandamus.
- Stanford Faculty Smear Professor Who Accurately Summarized Data On MasksOpen scientific discourse is especially critical duringcontinue reading >
- What The Right Needs Now Is The Courage To Fight Even If It Costs UsAll of a sudden, the conservative project is not a conscontinue reading >
- Top CDC Official Steps Down Weeks After Emails Surface Showing Collusion With Teachers UnionAnne Schuchat, the CDC's principal deputy director, wascontinue reading >