The decision protects unborn babies with Down syndrome, and tees up a potential SCOTUS challenge of Roe v. Wade.
The losing side needed to know that a fair shake was given, and that justice prevailed, even if it wasn’t the outcome they wanted. That did not happen after Nov. 3.
There is an unmistakable dissonance between Joe Biden’s calls for national unity and his party’s judicial obstructionism over the past four years.
As widespread claims of voter fraud begin to have their day in court, a closer look at the Trump lawsuit in Pennsylvania reveals that numerous claims of voter fraud aren’t really the core claims of the case.
Big Tech is at it again, this time with Twitter censoring The Federalist’s co-founder Sean Davis. His offense? Quoting an official Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision.
As a conservative, an originalist, and a black American, I am greatly intrigued by Sen. Edward Markey’s claim that applying the Constitution as it’s written is racist.
Democrats don’t have to publicly commit to a party goal of packing the Supreme Court. They’ve got a rich network of activist groups working hard on the issue behind closed doors.
Barrett’s authored opinions give no reason to believe she automatically accepts or rejects a government agency’s interpretation of the law.
Democrats’ latest ploy to halt Barrett’s confirmation includes alleging that the hearings cannot move forward because two senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee have contracted the coronavirus.
Such a move would cement Trump’s biggest success: picking committed and youthful originalists—judges who will interpret the Constitution according to its original public meaning
The attacks on Barrett fail to identify the ‘abortion restrictions’ at issue and purposely so, to create the impression she is an extremist.
Nothing better captures the Republican disaster of Supreme Court nominations than George H.W. Bush selecting David Souter, who evolved from mild conservative to left-wing leader.
Trump vowed to choose a nominee from the 2016 list, so he should nominate Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court.
The next president will likely solidify a lasting majority on the courts of appeals, either cementing President Trump’s judicial legacy or largely undoing it.
Judges who can find no support in law for the outcome they want resort to their own personal sense of morality to achieve their desired result.
For nearly four hours Tuesday, the full D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals drilled attorneys for Michael Flynn, the DOJ, and Judge Emmet Sullivan on a wide range of issues, including separation of powers and the propriety of mandamus.
Sen. Josh Hawley’s pledge to vote only for nominees who have objected to Roe v. Wade would mean a vote against Clarence Thomas, and in favor of David Souter, Anthony Kennedy, and Sandra Day O’Connor.
The decision could radically change criminal justice in the state, cast doubt on thousands of convictions, and endanger protections for tribal children.
By opening his courtroom to John Gleeson and other anti-Flynn amici, Judge Sullivan has converted the judicial branch into an emissary of the Democratic Party.
- GOP Lawmaker Caves On Democrats’ 9/11-Style Commission To Investigate Capitol RiotRepublicans on the House Homeland Security Committee hacontinue reading >
- Ad Seeks To Place ‘A Pair Of Destructive Demon Cats Who Stink Up Your Home’If Prancer, the 'haunted Victorian child' dog from viracontinue reading >
- Would An Actual Potato Be Better At Hosting ‘Reliable Sources’ Than Brian Stelter?If potato head Brian Stelter finds an elementary maskincontinue reading >