Mollie Hemingway and David Harsanyi discuss the more-than-biased news media and the latest smears against Justice Kavanaugh on the Federalist Radio Hour.
From the internet fever swamps of the left-wing commentariat, plans have emerged to remove Brett Kavanaugh from the Supreme Court by any means necessary.
Let’s dispense with the fiction that the media is objective and impartial, and admit that we’ve returned to the historical norm of biased news.
After complaining that their book was ‘seized’ for political purposes, now a New York Times reporter is blaming Fox News for the backlash against her and her coauthor’s uncorroborated stories.
There are three problems with Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly’s claims about correcting a smear against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh in a New York Times article Saturday.
The day of the NYT Times Reporters’ book was released, “Justice On Trial” ranks No. 168 on Amazon while “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation” trailed behind at No. 188.
A new Atlantic-published, adapted excerpt of the book attempts to resurrect Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly’s anti-Kavanaugh smears but once again has a major error.
Reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly make more uncorroborated allegations against Kavanaugh on ‘The View’ all while painting themselves as the victims.
On Tuesday Vice President Mike Pence branded calls from Democratic presidential candidates for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh to be impeached a ‘disgrace.’
It’s not that the reporters mentioned the most important fact and it was edited out by NPR. Pogrebin and Kelly have a pattern of omitting this detail, and other key details.
Americans of all political stripes believe we live in a political emergency. Emergencies are exciting, but often don’t lead to very good long-term decision making.
Mollie Hemingway and Carrie Severino discuss why it is unacceptable for The New York Times to publish allegations that the alleged victim doesn’t recall.
Democrats, who have no interest in living with the constraints of the Constitution, see little downside in destroying trust in the Supreme Court.
Nearly every major 2020 Democratic candidate has called on the Supreme Court’s newest justice, Brett Kavanaugh, to be impeached this week after the New York Times reported on fresh claims of previously unreported conduct, without any evidence to support the new allegations.
Yes, Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed. But that isn’t justice. Justice requires consequences for those who tarnished the man and lied to Senate Judiciary investigators and committee members.
In a correction, The New York Times admitted the premise of its much-hyped story about an alleged incident with Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was false.
“It just didn’t make any sense,” lifelong friend Leland Keyser told New York Times reporters about Ford’s allegations, adding “I don’t have any confidence in the story.”
New York Times airs a claim from a Democrat attorney, failing to note the alleged victim denies memory of the incident.
After Christine Blasey Ford publicly alleged without evidence that Brett Kavanaugh tried to rape her, her father repeatedly communicated to Kavanaugh’s father that he supported Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court.
The attorney for a woman who made unsupported allegations of sexual assault against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh admitted that she and her client Christine Blasey Ford were motivated by their support for abortion.
- Here’s How Boris Johnson Gets The Brexit Deal The U.K. Really NeedsAlthough British Prime Minister Boris Johnson seems to continue reading >
- The Russian Spy Who Wasn’t? Defamation Case Accuses U.S., U.K. Intelligence Of Using Michael Flynn For Spygate HoaxSvetlana Lokhova pieced together an apparent coordinatecontinue reading >
- Hearings Expose How Kamala Harris Used Prosecutorial Power To Benefit Abortion Businesses That Support Her Campaigns'The attorney general had no evidence whatsoever that tcontinue reading >